SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Bioinformatics > Bioinformatics



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Removing duplicates is it really necessary? foxyg Bioinformatics 34 12-02-2016 01:17 PM
removing duplicates in small (si)RNA data Kennels Bioinformatics 1 02-29-2012 09:03 PM
Duplicates percentage in target resequencing Seq84 Illumina/Solexa 5 04-29-2011 06:16 AM
26% duplicates KevinLam Bioinformatics 4 08-19-2010 04:20 PM
How to explain this scenario ? mingkunli 454 Pyrosequencing 5 02-24-2009 07:02 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-05-2011, 11:29 AM   #1
Hkins552
Member
 
Location: Baltimore MD

Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 18
Post Removing Duplicates Scenario Exome Resequencing

I am rethinking my well-established pipeline and trying to tweek it a bit and came across some controversy on the use of remove duplicates. I would like to propose an example scenario and my current understanding of Picard Tool's Mark Dups:

At a given 5' loci (chr12:144230), two alleles are present (assume these are the first three nucleotides of 90bp reads):
1) GAC #reads = 30 Highest Q score= 25
2) GAA #reads = 8 Highest Q score= 26

It is possible that some of the 30 reads of allele 1 are due to strand bias or pcr dup. and if visualizing this on an aligner, I would have some suspicion that the locus is heterozygous.

If Mark Duplicates: Allele 2 is kept due to highest Q score, and thus there is loss of heterozygosity

If no duplicate removal: Both alleles are kept, but the ration is not close enough to 50% to be called a het.

Is my very rudimentary understanding of this tool correct and, if so, are there any other solutions?
Does anyone have recommendations based on the fact that this particular project is exome resequencing at 50-75x average depth?)
Hkins552 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2011, 05:23 PM   #2
Heisman
Senior Member
 
Location: St. Louis

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 535
Default

With 75x coverage and I'm assuming paired end reads that has a size distribution with a standard deviation of at least 30bp, it is very unlikely for you to get multiple reads to pile up at the same exact locations without them being PCR duplicates. I would remove them for SNP calling.
Heisman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
duplicates, exome, resequencing

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO