I am getting very low counts for genes that I know to be represented by multiple RNAseq reads. I suspect this is because the genes are multi-copy in the genome. In reading how HTseq-count treats such instances, I find the explanation a little confusing: "ambiguous - reads which could have been assigned to more than one feature and hence were not counted for any of these"; and "alignment_not_unique - reads with more than one reported alignment. These reads are recognized from the NH optional SAM field tag. (If the aligner does not set this field, multiply aligned reads will be counted multiple times.)" As I interpret the documentation, "ambiguous" reads are not counted but "alignment-not-unique" reads are counted multiple times. However, to me it seems like alignment-not-unique reads ARE ambiguous and should therefore be treated the same way. I find it a little disconcerting that one cannot count reads matching repeated genes that occur as few as five times in a genome because this precludes any kind of differential expression analysis. Is there a good reason not to count alignments for multicopy sequences?
Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
-
Heh, while the "alignment_not_unique" reads are, indeed, ambiguously mapped, "ambiguous" here has a slightly different meaning that can most easily been seen visually. Basically, "ambiguous" here means it can be assigned to overlapping genes (there are a bunch of those). I can see how that wording can be confusing, though I can't easily think of a better term that could have been used.
Regarding not counting reads mapped to duplicate genes, yeah, that can be an issue. If you're interested in comparing gene families that are highly similar, then you'd need to use a different script (or perhaps the python interface, I've never used it). htseq-count has no way to know that a multi-mapped read maps into a conserved part of a gene family rather than just randomly into a repetitive (or generally low complexity) region.
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by seqadmin
The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist...-
Channel: Articles
04-22-2024, 07:01 AM -
-
by seqadmin
Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...-
Channel: Articles
04-04-2024, 04:25 PM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 08:47 AM
|
0 responses
12 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
Yesterday, 08:47 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
|
0 responses
60 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
|
0 responses
59 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
|
0 responses
54 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
|
Comment