SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Bioinformatics > Bioinformatics



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DEXseq - very low numbers of counts kajot RNA Sequencing 6 08-03-2018 11:04 PM
DEseq2: can filtering low count genes reduce the number of DE genes? JonB Bioinformatics 2 06-10-2014 06:15 AM
SRA top level studies counts, why is 2013 so low? JamieWizard Bioinformatics 7 06-09-2014 12:16 AM
public dataset with exon counts iancuo General 1 10-31-2013 05:25 PM
known TF target genes in chipSeq dataset honey Bioinformatics 2 04-09-2012 11:30 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-17-2014, 01:45 PM   #1
tellsparck
Member
 
Location: Philadelphia

Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 19
Default What to do with genes with very low counts in a dataset

Hi all,
I have a dataset from a single cell RNASeq project and there are many genes with very few counts (1 or 2 in a few samples) in the data set. While this is important info (tells us that these genes are not expressed), how would one handle them for a differential expression analysis (I use DESeq2)? Should I delete them or keep them? For me this means the difference between having a dataset with either ~17000 genes or ~11,500 genes (if I exclude genes with an average count less than 3).
Thanks for your thoughts on this!
tellsparck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2014, 02:18 PM   #2
dpryan
Devon Ryan
 
Location: Freiburg, Germany

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,480
Default

DESeq2 will filter them out for you, you needn't do it manually.
dpryan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2014, 04:37 PM   #3
Michael Love
Senior Member
 
Location: Boston

Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 333
Default

Devon's always got the right answer

If you want to know more about filtering out genes with few counts, we have a section on this (independent filtering) in the "Theory" part of the DESeq2 vignette.

A reference on independent filtering:

Bourgon R, Gentleman R, Huber W.
"Independent filtering increases detection power for high-throughput experiments."
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 25;107(21):9546-51. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914005107. Epub 2010 May 11.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20460310
Michael Love is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2014, 07:59 AM   #4
tellsparck
Member
 
Location: Philadelphia

Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 19
Default

Thanks for the quick replies, dpryan and Michael Love!
tellsparck is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO