Go Back   SEQanswers > Bioinformatics > Bioinformatics

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
miRBase - Why do they not keep name conventions? Soeren_Mueller Bioinformatics 0 08-20-2014 08:34 AM
extract miRNA-loop from miRBase Palgrave Bioinformatics 1 07-25-2014 06:07 AM
In miRBase search unique379 Bioinformatics 1 07-09-2013 01:59 PM
Mapping miRNA on miRBase nedoluzhko Bioinformatics 11 09-16-2012 01:25 AM
miRNA-seq - mapping to MIRBASE hrajasim Illumina/Solexa 0 02-28-2010 04:29 PM

Thread Tools
Old 10-02-2014, 06:42 AM   #1
Location: Italy

Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 27
Cool miRNA annotation from miRBase 21

Dear all,

I just checked miRBase 21 has released and try to look their annotation .gff for quantification. I noticed, in gff has more counts (mature) than miRNA reported in site ??? how and why i do not understand !!!!

counts shown in site : Mus musculus (1193 precursors, 1915 mature) [GRCm38]

counts from gff annotation: Mus musculus (1128 precursors, 2046 mature)

why ?? i have fear that it can affect in differential expression analysis. Because gff counts are not equal to real miRNA from the site. is it ??

please someone describe it ???? and tell me should i worry about it ?? either i use genome or miRBase reference for mapping.

Hope anyone has noticed it before ??
unique379 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2014, 08:06 AM   #2
Senior Member
Location: France

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 143

cross posted:
lindenb is offline   Reply With Quote

annoations, bioinfomatics, differential analysis, mirbase, mirna identification

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO