Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • too high sequencing coverage

    Hi,

    I sequenced by Illumina MiSeq some phage genomes. Normally, with bacterial genomes, I have an average sequencing coverage of 75-90x. But with the phages (much more small genomes) the coverages are more than 1500x.

    I have read at some places that a too high coverage might be "problematic". Is someone can explain to me why?

    Should I perform a random subsampling of my reads to assemble at a lowest average coverage (~100x)?

    Thank you,

    Antony

  • #2
    It depends on what you want to do. Most assemblers have heuristics geared toward much lower coverage, on the order of 100 or less. Super-high coverage may give very fragmented assemblies; with low coverage a given error is typically unique, but with high enough coverage the same error may be seen multiple times, and actually assembled. That will create false branches on a DeBruijn graph that may be cut, causing fragmentation. Some assemblers may also simply not assemble very-high coverage areas for other reasons.

    If you have fairly uniform coverage, subsampling is a good option. If you have variable coverage, normalization is a better choice.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • seqadmin
      Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
      by seqadmin


      The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist on Modified Bases...
      Yesterday, 07:01 AM
    • seqadmin
      Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
      by seqadmin


      Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
      04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
    0 responses
    45 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
    0 responses
    46 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
    0 responses
    39 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
    0 responses
    55 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Working...
    X