Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Velvet Assembler: expected coverage versus estimated coverage versus effective covera

    Hello everyone,

    I am very new to bioinformatics in general, and I am trying to assemble some short reads using velvet. Having read the manual, I am still not clear on the distinction between some of the coverage terms.

    Specifically, is the expected coverage the length weighted node or contig or kmer coverage?

    Is the estimated coverage actually referring to an estimate of the expected coverage, performed by velvet?

    Is the effective coverage the node coverage after errors have been removed using the coverage cutoff? Or is it an estimate of the proportion of the genome length that is covered by the assembled contigs?

    Finally, is there a difference between the coverage depth, and the coverage density? Are both these values expressed in units of 'X'? e.g. 5X coverage.

    Many thanks indeed for any help. This is really frustrating me!

  • #2
    Velvet coverage is not x-based. The coverage you are getting is k-mer coverage per contig. I know this question has been asked before, so I won't go into any detail. Some quick google searches should get you the answers you are looking for.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • seqadmin
      Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
      by seqadmin


      The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist on Modified Bases...
      Yesterday, 07:01 AM
    • seqadmin
      Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
      by seqadmin


      Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
      04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
    0 responses
    39 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
    0 responses
    41 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
    0 responses
    35 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
    0 responses
    55 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Working...
    X