SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Sequencing Technologies/Companies > Illumina/Solexa



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
why different read coverage in the same gene in one sample sadiexiaoyu Bioinformatics 2 06-17-2013 11:44 PM
"Concave" coverage pattern - problem with sample prep? mewahl Sample Prep / Library Generation 2 06-10-2011 08:09 AM
Sample/library prep of DNA and RNA in a metagenomic sample chrisaw01 Metagenomics 1 05-05-2011 01:59 PM
read length limits sample prep time? zhengz Ion Torrent 0 02-26-2011 11:36 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-14-2017, 09:23 PM   #1
Meyana
Member
 
Location: Japan

Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 24
Post Read coverage and accurate sample prep

Hello!

I used to be in a lab that did a lot of sequencing - however, all sequencing and prepping fell on few people in the lab. Therefore I have some overview of the process of sample prepping, but need help with making sure everything is properly planned for NGS work in my new lab. My boss is asking me to calculate costs, so we can plan what is most suitable for our budget.

Material: Mitochondrial DNA (may contain miniscule traces of nDNA)
DNA amount for prepping: 0.5-1.5ng (expected)
Planned prep kit: NEBNext® Ultra™ II DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina®
(as it seems to be able to handle the very low input material that I will have)

Question 1
Since mtDNA is rather small (<20kb), you generally don't need too many reads pr. sample. However, I will be doing assessment of heteroplasmy, so I will need a good read coverage, so not under something like 3000x.

Can somebody help me with how to calculate how many reads I will need?


Question 2
Choosing indexes.
I will be running the samples on either a MiSeq or HiSeq, depending on how many samples we end up with/how many samples I can put on the MiSeq (this is a cost issue).
Will *all* indexes be equally good on either the MiSeq or HiSeq?
I understand that the MiSeq uses dual indexing as a standard, why I was thinking to buy these indexes: NEBNext® Ultra™ II DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina®
However, I am very confused about choosing the proper indexes, and would like some input.


Thank you so much for any help you can provide
Meyana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2017, 10:45 PM   #2
Genetic Librarian
Member
 
Location: Europe

Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 28
Default

Hi,

Question 1: Your output requirement is 16kb (target size) * 3000 (coverage)

Thus, per sample you would need 48 Megabases as output.
A MiSeq v2 2x 150 bp PE run e.g. has an output of 5 Gigabases, so theoretically you could pool 104 samples on one Run. Substract a bit of duplicates, unassigned samples, PhiX etc. and you could aim for ~80 samples / Run.
Basically, that is what the Illumina Coverage Calculator does .

You can calculate the number of samples on a HiSeq lane (Output 90 Gb / Lane) yourself (hint: this is absolute overkill vor mtGenomes).

Question 2: For mtGenome, we used the Nextera XT Kit with its associated Indices.
Genetic Librarian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2017, 10:50 PM   #3
Meyana
Member
 
Location: Japan

Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 24
Default

Perfect, thank you so much!
I tried to use the Coverage Calculator, but I am not sure I really understood the results it gave me - so I figured it better to ask for assistance

Do you have any experience in starting with under the recommended 1ng DNA for the Nextera XT kit? My starting material is a small brain tissue sample, so I am worried about how much material will be available for me. I will test next week when all my reagents are delivered, but I really doubt I will reach 1ng mtDNA...
Meyana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2017, 10:53 PM   #4
Genetic Librarian
Member
 
Location: Europe

Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 28
Default

We always amplified the mtGenome in two long range PCRs, so we were never limited in material.
At the end, our final libraries were quite large (fragment size) and output was good, so I guess it might work well with 0,5 ng as well.
Genetic Librarian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2017, 05:28 PM   #5
Meyana
Member
 
Location: Japan

Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 24
Default

Thanks.
I really would like to avoid doing PCR prior to sample prep, as the mutations I will be investigating are probably at a relatively low frequency + there might be smaller/larger deleted regions, and any PCR induced mutations or PCR bias towards some fragments due to deletions will likely interfere with downstream analysis...
Meyana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2017, 01:41 AM   #6
torben
Member
 
Location: Norway

Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Meyana View Post
Perfect, thank you so much!
Do you have any experience in starting with under the recommended 1ng DNA for the Nextera XT kit? My starting material is a small brain tissue sample, so I am worried about how much material will be available for me. I will test next week when all my reagents are delivered, but I really doubt I will reach 1ng mtDNA...
The easiest way to scale down is to reduce all the volumes in the reaction. I usually use half the volumes given in Illumina's protocol, and I have collaborators who only use a quarter of the volume. You need to have your DNA in a pretty small volume though (≤1.25-2.5 µl). I elute my DNA in pure water and use a speed-vac to reduce the volume, but be carefull not to overdry the samples. Alternatively, I guess you can also use the normal volumes and only reduce the Tagment Mix to matvh your DNA input but I've never tried this.
torben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2017, 09:11 PM   #7
Meyana
Member
 
Location: Japan

Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 24
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by torben View Post
The easiest way to scale down is to reduce all the volumes in the reaction. I usually use half the volumes given in Illumina's protocol, and I have collaborators who only use a quarter of the volume. You need to have your DNA in a pretty small volume though (≤1.25-2.5 µl). I elute my DNA in pure water and use a speed-vac to reduce the volume, but be carefull not to overdry the samples. Alternatively, I guess you can also use the normal volumes and only reduce the Tagment Mix to matvh your DNA input but I've never tried this.
Thanks for this very useful info! I was also thinking of cutting everything in half, but was unsure as to whether this would be a bad choice somewhere in the procedure. Nice to hear other people are doing this successfully!
Now currently awaiting a new Qubit, so I can accurately measure my samples, not trusting the NanoDrop for these small concentrations...

I will ask around for the presence of a speed-vac, will probably need one no matter how I do this, as I am eluting my DNA in a too high volume from my Ampure beads (anyone know how little elution volume you can get away with using pr. vol Ampure?)
Meyana is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
index, library prep, miseq, mitochondrial

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO