![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to deal with extremely unbalanced coverage in pooled sequencing data? | Jiafen | Bioinformatics | 0 | 11-07-2012 01:42 PM |
extra high coverage regions in exome sequencing data | lyz1030 | Bioinformatics | 1 | 10-22-2012 03:26 AM |
Agilent SureSelect - coverage of high GC regions | NGSfan | Genomic Resequencing | 28 | 11-07-2011 02:13 PM |
Extremely high cy3 signals | chenglei | SOLiD | 3 | 10-05-2011 08:14 AM |
downsampling high coverage regions in SAGs | novi | Bioinformatics | 0 | 06-30-2011 02:28 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: Portugal Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 11
|
![]()
Dear all,
I am currently working with NGS data for one individual sequenced using Illumina HiSeq 2000 (13-16x coverage). I follow some standard pipelines to align and prepare the data for variant calling (BWA, Picard and GATK). (I am not interested in exome analysis but I've followed this pipeline to prepare the BAM files http://seqanswers.com/wiki/How-to/exome_analysis) When I was ready for the calling step I decided to check the coverage of this individual using BEDTools. The average coverage looks good (14/15X) but in some regions I get extremely high values like 9200x or higher ! I don't think that this is normal and I believe that these values are not OK even for repetitive regions... Do you have any idea of what might be wrong? Thank you all in advance, J |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Location: Cambridge, MA Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 23
|
![]()
This is normal although it should only happen in a few regions. This paper suggests that it is due to misassembled regions of the reference where there should be many copies of a repeat but there's only one in the assembly:
http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals...rmatics.btr354 You could check the BED files linked to from that paper to see if they match up with your high peaks. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Location: Portugal Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 11
|
![]()
Dear cwhelan,
Thanks for the reply! Yes! Maybe its normal because I only get a few strange peaks. Thanks again, J |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
coverage, illumina, ngs, pipeline |
Thread Tools | |
|
|