Go Back   SEQanswers > Applications Forums > Genomic Resequencing

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Planning a cancer exome sequencing project sadiqsaleem09 Genomic Resequencing 6 05-09-2011 08:38 PM
PubMed: Massively Parallel Sequencing of Pooled DNA Samples--The Next Generation of M Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 05-12-2010 02:01 AM
PubMed: Deep sequencing to reveal new variants in pooled DNA samples. Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 10-21-2009 02:02 AM
PubMed: SNP frequency estimation using massively parallel sequencing of pooled DNA. Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 10-16-2008 05:00 AM

Thread Tools
Old 02-12-2015, 03:02 PM   #1
Junior Member
Location: Aus

Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 2
Default What are key factors to consider while planning pooled DNA sequencing


I am planning to sequence two pooled DNA samples. I was wondering if there is:

1) Minimum number of individuals that should be pooled to make up each sample. More specifically, would pooling of 2-3 individuals per sample be enough to detect sufficient number of variants to distinguish it from sequencing errors?
2) The methods that can be conducted to eliminate false positive SNPs from the generated data.

Thanks and best regards!
San220 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2015, 11:19 PM   #2
Jafar Jabbari
Location: Melbourne

Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,232

If you post more info on your planned work such as sample numbers, genome size and aims your question will be more clear.
nucacidhunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2015, 11:28 PM   #3
Senior Member
Location: Berlin, Germany

Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 137

Is there a specific reason why you want to pool the samples, and not make separate libraries for each? Except for saving money on library construction, there is no benefit in pooling, rather the opposite.

1) The more individuals you pool, the more difficult it will be to distinguish variants from sequencing errors, as you are diluting the signal for rare variant alleles.
2) The simplest method to reduce the number of false positives is brute force - increase the sequencing depth per sample. There are several bioinformatic methods implemented in current variant callers (e.g. GATK) to account for typical sequencing biases leading to false positive calls.

If your main interest is comparing different conditions (represented by large groups of individuals, e.g. disease vs control groups), you would typically need more individuals (think of 20-30 per group rather than 2-3) unless there are strong reasons to expect single variants to explain the condition (which is almost never the case). Still single libraries would give you much more useful data and more statistical power than pooled libraries.
sarvidsson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2015, 05:04 PM   #4
Junior Member
Location: Aus

Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 2

You're right about the objective of the study Sarvidsson, which is to conduct variant analysis between fast (plant root) growth-rate vs slow growth-rate groups with 60-70x coverage for each of the two libraries.
I was hoping to find more than 2-3 individuals per group,unfortunately that didn't happen and I ended up with a greatly reduced pool-size. Financially, I can only sequence two libraries which means I either scrap this idea or go ahead with sequencing two, small pool-sized groups.
What do you guys think? Thanks
San220 is offline   Reply With Quote

plant, pooled sequencing

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO