Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DESeq with time points & different samples

    Hi all,
    I'm a PhD student newbie to statistical analysis in RNAseq. I got an experimental design and I'm trying to find a good way to approach the analysis of the results.
    Basically, I have 5 different fruit varieties harvested at 4 different time points that have been RNAsequenced (so far with no replicas, don't know if we'll get a second shot). I was asked to find those genes showing a different behavior in the 5 varieties both in terms of differential expression on the respective time points and in terms of time course. I thought to use DESeq with the "blind" method (according to the vignette) by making a pair-wise comparison of one of such varieties (and in one time point) with the others (and the other time points, within the same, repeated for the 5).

    The problem is, that I am not sure whether this is the most straight-forward way to approach this problem and, moreover, it is still not so clear to me how to represent the results (if making a mega-merge or so).

    Does anyone have/can give me a hint?
    many thanks
    Marco

  • #2
    not so easy...

    I don't want to offend you - not al all - but perhaps your supervisors...

    why do people plan their experiments not carefully? nobody would make a western blot without knowing how to analyse and interpret the results, but thousonds of bucks get invested in NGS and there is no plan who will and how to analyse.

    For you design I see no satisfactory solution. without knowing at least a littlebit about biological variance of each sample and timepoint there is no chance to get robust differentially expressed genes.

    If I would have 20 samples free, I would have analysed e.g. either the 5 fruits with 4 biological replicates or 2 fruits at 3 timepoints with three replicates.

    One chance will be a gene (set) enrichment analysis (G(S)EA) which works different (it accumulates statistical information over genes, not over samples)) and does not need necessarily biological replicates.

    I don't know if a time-series version of G(S)EA is available, at least a version for multigroup analysis is available, implemented in the R-package limma (mroast-function). you can import your count-table (htseq-count) with voom() create a contrast matrix and analyse with mroast.
    Last edited by dietmar13; 03-17-2013, 11:06 PM. Reason: typo...

    Comment


    • #3
      Thank you Dietmar, I'll try with that.
      Regarding the general thing, we are interested in spotting at differences in ripening, and thus at genes that are differentially expressed with each other during the process.
      I thought I could first look at the time development and then, after having identified (grouped) those genes showing the same expression behavior, perform a kind of pair-wise comparison with one variety that I think I can
      surely take as reference.
      Maybe this is not optimal, but is the best thing I can think about at the moment. Do you think is reasonable?
      Thanks

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • seqadmin
        Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
        by seqadmin




        The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist...
        Yesterday, 07:01 AM
      • seqadmin
        Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
        by seqadmin


        Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
        04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
      0 responses
      57 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
      0 responses
      53 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
      0 responses
      45 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
      0 responses
      55 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Working...
      X