![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nextera XT Normalisation | JoeChris38 | Illumina/Solexa | 5 | 05-26-2014 01:58 AM |
Nextera XT | gillt | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 0 | 03-06-2013 04:05 PM |
Nextera kits | HMorrison | 454 Pyrosequencing | 3 | 11-01-2011 12:00 PM |
Problems with Nextera | John.Sawyer | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 3 | 04-11-2011 06:33 AM |
nextera | niceday | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 5 | 09-10-2010 10:31 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Location: Basel (Switzerland) Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 208
|
![]()
Hi all,
I tried to figure out the difference between Nextera and Nextera XT kit (for low input). With the Nextera kit I was never able to get good libraries when starting from <1 ng input DNA, while with the Nextera XT kit I got great results from <100 pg DNA. I believe the enzyme is the same (I donīt think Illumina took the effort to engineer the transposase twice when they bought Epicentre Technologies...), so the difference must lie in the buffer. I am quite sure that the Nextera kit uses a regular Tris+MgCl2 buffer, but what about the XT kit? Any help is greatly appreciated! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: US Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 453
|
![]()
I would guess they reduced the enzyme concentration and added polyethyleneglycol (PEG) to the buffer to reduce the available volume (similar to the rapid ligation protocols).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Location: Basel (Switzerland) Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 208
|
![]()
thanks! actually I just got some decent results today, just increasing the ionic strength of the final solution (adding potassium acetate). lower yield but similar profile at the Bioanalyzer
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Location: NC Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 11
|
![]()
I am also curious about this.
Also, why does Illumina suggest to use Nextera XT to make libraries only for small genomes? Can we directly use Nextera XT to make libraries for small amount (<1ng) of mouse/human genomic DNA instead of optimizing the buffer in Nextera kit? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Location: USA Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 186
|
![]()
A diploid copy of the human genome is about 7pg. A 1ng sample would only have a bit over 100 copies of the genome, which is probably too little to generate a good library from.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Location: NC Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 11
|
![]()
Good point. Thanks kccchan!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Location: Basel (Switzerland) Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 208
|
![]()
for the genomic DNA 1 ng could be too little. I am doing single-cell RNA-seq and when starting from 1 ng or less (after RT & pre-amplification, of course) we get very high-quality data.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Location: NC Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 11
|
![]()
Thanks Simone78. It will be great if you could also tell us something you have found about how the ionic strength of the final solution affects the reaction.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Senior Member
Location: Basel (Switzerland) Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 208
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Location: NC Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 11
|
![]()
Thanks Simone78. Good luck with your paper! And would you please let me know when it is published?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Location: NC Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 11
|
![]()
Hi Simone78, I was wondering if your paper has been published? I'm still interested in how to make good libraries from <1ng DNA using the Nextera kit. Thanks!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
Location: Basel (Switzerland) Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 208
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Member
Location: HKUST, Hong Kong Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 32
|
![]() Quote:
Recently I've got the plasmid from you guys as a generous gift, and gave a try to purify the Tn5 Tnp. After following every single step of the protocol (except for the competent strain C3013, we used BL21DE3 instead), there was no activity in the Tnp activity assay at all. The protein size is correct on the SDS PAGE Gel. So I guess there must be some issues in the transpososome assembly. Would you please give me some advice? Best! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Senior Member
Location: Basel (Switzerland) Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 208
|
![]()
Have you tried to do the assembly in solution as we describe in the paper? Just elute the tn5 from the column and add the oligos in equimolar conc with the Tn5 --> incubate 37 degrees --> ready to use. If that doesnīt work then you might have an issue with the Tn5.
Best, Simone |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Member
Location: HKUST, Hong Kong Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 32
|
![]() Quote:
Best! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Member
Location: HKUST, Hong Kong Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 32
|
![]() Quote:
I tried to produce the Tnp once again with the C3013 lately. But the strain seemed to reach plateau phase after the A600=1.3. No matter there is IPTG induction or not, same thing happened. However, according to your protocol, the A600 should reach 2.1 after IPTG induction for around 4h. The protein solution is still being dialyzed, I will test if there is any activity after that in any case. But the strain seems weird on our hands. Maybe you can give me some advices. Thanks! Cheers, Gary |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Junior Member
Location: London, UK Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 5
|
![]()
Hi all,
I'm also trying to purify Tn5 using the pTXB1 plasmid, and I also don't have transpososome activity when assembled in solution with oligos. Does anyone have a slightly more detailed protocol (I'm a molecular biologist playing at protein biochemistry...) - especially regarding how to carry out the column steps, recommended equipment etc? I think my attempt was too drawn out in time (even though I did most of it in a cold room at 4C) and this may have led to incorrect folding/degradation. Any advice much appreciated! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Member
Location: HKUST, Hong Kong Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 32
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Junior Member
Location: London, UK Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 5
|
![]()
I received the plasmid from Addgene, indeed. May I ask what equipment you use for the purification - i.e. AKTA etc? Have you tried both on-column and in solution assembly?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Member
Location: HKUST, Hong Kong Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 32
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
buffer, nextera, nextera xt, tagmentation |
Thread Tools | |
|
|