SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Sequencing Technologies/Companies > Illumina/Solexa



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Price of sequencer SDPA_Pet Illumina/Solexa 5 08-20-2017 04:20 AM
What do you look for in a sequencer? jbannonARK General 0 02-18-2015 11:24 AM
Hello from a Sanger sequencer Ann235 Introductions 1 05-19-2013 01:43 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-03-2018, 05:38 AM   #1
GenoMax
Senior Member
 
Location: East Coast USA

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,795
Default Illumina Firefly sequencer

We can look forward to announcement of one (previously talked about) Illumina Sequencer next week at J.P. Morgan meeting.

At least one person has the sequencer in their lab: https://twitter.com/mason_lab/status/943639593303396352
GenoMax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2018, 09:17 AM   #2
SNPsaurus
Registered Vendor
 
Location: Eugene, OR

Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 451
Default

I was trying to understand the niche of Firefly from that tweet. 6M reads, length of 2x150, 16 hour runtime. That sounds very similar to a MiSeq micro run.
__________________
Providing nextRAD genotyping and PacBio sequencing services. http://snpsaurus.com
SNPsaurus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2018, 11:23 AM   #3
GenoMax
Senior Member
 
Location: East Coast USA

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,795
Default

Dr. Keith Robinson has some thoughts in his blog post. Perhaps consumables will be cheaper and fast turnaround would be attractive for small labs. Cores may find this useful for QC'ing pools/libraries too.
GenoMax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2018, 11:24 AM   #4
misterc
Member
 
Location: Livermore, CA

Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 32
Default

Cheaper instruments from the orange empire typically mean higher cost per sample. The other piece to Firefly is the module (shipping sometime later in 2018 IIRC) that can perform sample prep for this same box (like the now defunct NeoPrep).
misterc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2018, 04:16 PM   #5
SanDiegome
Junior Member
 
Location: San Diego, CA

Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 2
Default Qiagen Killer?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SNPsaurus View Post
I was trying to understand the niche of Firefly from that tweet. 6M reads, length of 2x150, 16 hour runtime. That sounds very similar to a MiSeq micro run.
I've been thinking about this for a while. My best guess is that the Firefly, paired with the future sample prep module, is best positioned against Qiagen's GeneReader (which is solely going after the clinical market). Apart from that, it's not clear that this configuration is solving a big problem currently facing the research market.
__________________
--
Shawn Baker
SanDiegOmics.com
SanDiegome is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2018, 04:27 AM   #6
GenoMax
Senior Member
 
Location: East Coast USA

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,795
Default

Illumina is calling "firefly" iSeq 100. Information and pre-orders are now available: https://www.illumina.com/systems/seq...orms/iseq.html

Priced at $19,900 in US.
GenoMax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2018, 05:51 AM   #7
GW_OK
Senior Member
 
Location: Oklahoma

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 402
Default

One third of the reads for two-thirds the cost of a Miseq v2 kit. At least for PE150.

I really don't see the point unless they're trying to get installed in that last fraction of labs that just have to have their own machines but couldn't swing the capex for a Miniseq.

Also, hey, what about the Miniseq? Is it going the way of the Neoprep?
GW_OK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2018, 06:25 AM   #8
GenoMax
Senior Member
 
Location: East Coast USA

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,795
Default

It has been in development for 2+ years so I guess they have to try and recover some of the development costs. Initial cost of entry seems to be low and the whole thing appears "fool"-proof so pretty much anyone can use it. There are always those who want to have the "latest" in their labs. It could be a QC machine for large cores to balance library pools for large projects.

Did I miss any other "benefits" :-)
GenoMax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2018, 08:26 AM   #9
luc
Senior Member
 
Location: US

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 342
Default

I guess the low instrument cost and the small size are supposed to sway people who are impressed by the nanopore instruments? despite the data being of completely different nature.
I twill totally depend on the reagent costs if this system becomes relevant.
luc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2018, 08:38 AM   #10
GenoMax
Senior Member
 
Location: East Coast USA

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,795
Default

Per sample cost is supposed to be between $25 and $150 according to GenomeWeb. Not clear if that is just the cost of the sequencing reagents.
GenoMax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2018, 08:42 AM   #11
GW_OK
Senior Member
 
Location: Oklahoma

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 402
Default

I'll bet that's library prep costs, which is inline with Nextera per sample costs.

Keith Robinson's saying the PE150 reagents are $625 with a 5% discount if bought in 4-packs.

Last edited by GW_OK; 01-09-2018 at 08:53 AM.
GW_OK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2018, 08:44 AM   #12
luc
Senior Member
 
Location: US

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 342
Default

This has more details:
http://omicsomics.blogspot.com/2018/01/iseq.html#more

If the flowcell price is correct it seems that the instrument is currently only of interest in cases where speed is of absolute priority (although the IonTorrents should still be faster) - and perhaps the simplified operation. I guess the libraries would still have to be quantified well to achieve good data.

Last edited by luc; 01-10-2018 at 11:52 AM.
luc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2018, 11:20 AM   #13
hoytpr
Member
 
Location: Stillwater

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 50
Default

Turnaround is really important. The market for these machines is the ~$100 per bacterial genome smaller groups. 1.2 Gbp is about 8-10 bacteria at 30X coverage. If the libraries are cheap enough (~$30) then those smaller labs that want to pay $100 per bacterial genome are going to be happy. Our core is small enough that it's hard to regularly queue up 200 bacterial genomes even if the price is good with our NextSeq.
hoytpr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2018, 11:55 AM   #14
luc
Senior Member
 
Location: US

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 342
Default

I guess the libraries are the same as for the other Illumina sequencers?
luc is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
firefly, illumina

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO