Go Back   SEQanswers > Bioinformatics > Bioinformatics

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
methods for variant detection on pooled samples dnusol Bioinformatics 15 08-07-2013 11:59 PM
pros and cons of Illumina fangquan Illumina/Solexa 2 06-06-2012 01:01 PM
Pros and Cons of NextGen Sequencers ebhobbs General 4 10-08-2009 08:35 AM

Thread Tools
Old 06-27-2013, 03:26 PM   #1
Location: USA

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 60
Question splicing variant methods and their pros and cons

Hi All,

I read a post here about isoform expression quanification from RNA-Seq, and was really impressed by the summaries. I am working on a project comparing three methods (SplicingCompass, DEXSeq and MISO), for the exon-level differential exon usage. I have 8 biological samples in the control group, and 8 biological samples in the treatment group. The design is as below:

condition subject
C1 control 1
C2 control 2
C3 control 3
C4 control 4
C5 control 5
C6 control 6
C7 control 7
C8 control 8
T1 treatment 1
T2 treatment 2
T3 treatment 3
T4 treatment 4
T5 treatment 5
T6 treatment 6
T7 treatment 7
T8 treatment 8

As you can see from the last column, subject 1 has both the control and the treatment, and so on for all the other subjects. This is kind of different from conventional experiments where each sample receives its unique treatment. Our task is to detect differential exon usage between control and treatment.

Because of this and the fact that we have biological replicates, it seems that DEXSeq is the best fit in this situation (include subject as a covariate in the GLM setting). However, I just want to clarify

(1) if SplicingCompass can also handle biological replicates? It is less clear to me as users need to input GFF and BED files for each of the samples.

(2) if MISO is appropriate to use. This is a big concern because I see MISO has the biggest disadvantage of not handling bio. reps... It is really strange (as discussed in this post) that there are only two files: one control and one knockdown, to be passed to What can we get (statistically and biologically) if we don't consider bio. reps?

(3) both SplicingCompass and MISO have to ignore the subject effect? I think there is no way the two methods can include the effect without using GLM... I really don't know how different the results would be.

Thank you so much for your suggestions!!
alittleboy is offline   Reply With Quote

dexseq, miso, splicingcompass

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO