Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • summarizeOverlaps vs countOverlaps

    Dear All,

    I am getting completely different results for the count of mapped reads on transcript features using the countOverlaps and summarizeOverlaps.

    CountOverlaps on using a gappedAlignment and Granges object gives slightly different results. SummarizeOverlaps gives totally different results for the modes "Union" and "intersectionNotEmpty".

    Can someone please let me know where I am making a mistake. I have attached a screenshot of the transcripts. All the transcripts belong to the same gene.

    Following steps were performed by me on a small subset of my data

    1. I built a gapped alignment object of mapped reads using the command
    reads=readBamGappedAlignments("path / to / bam/sorted.bam")

    2. From the gapped alignment I built a genomic ranges object
    ranges=GRanges(seqnames=rname(reads),
    ranges=IRanges(start=start(reads),
    end=end(reads)),strand=rep("*",length(reads)))

    3. I built a genomic ranges list from a custom genedb object (4 transcripts).
    geneE=exonsBy(genedb,'gene')

    4. Used the count and summarize overlaps functions
    a). count1=countOverlaps(geneE, reads)
    b). count2=countOverlaps(geneE, ranges)
    c). count3=assays(summarizeOverlaps(geneE, reads,
    mode="UNION"))$counts[,1]
    c). count4=assays(summarizeOverlaps(geneE, reads,
    mode="intersectionNotEmpty"))$counts[,1]

    5. I get four different count results
    "T1, T2, T3, T4"
    a). count1 "55972, 41029, 18270, 18734"
    b). count2 "55989, 41046, 18287, 18751"
    c). count3 "0, 2, 0, 1092"
    d). count4 "0, 3712, 0, 2550"
    Attached Files

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
    by seqadmin




    The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist...
    04-22-2024, 07:01 AM
  • seqadmin
    Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
    by seqadmin


    Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
    04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 11:49 AM
0 responses
13 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-24-2024, 08:47 AM
0 responses
16 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
0 responses
61 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
0 responses
60 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X