SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Applications Forums > RNA Sequencing



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Biological and technical replicates in expression analysis (DESeq) NicoBxl RNA Sequencing 0 08-22-2013 05:01 AM
Merging Mapped Reads from Technical Replicates Fernas RNA Sequencing 2 04-10-2013 03:48 PM
DESeq and technical replicates tamari Bioinformatics 0 10-17-2012 05:52 AM
Read runs and technical replicates scottdaniel RNA Sequencing 3 04-30-2012 12:49 PM
technical replicates uncorrelate with each other tujchl Epigenetics 4 05-26-2011 07:16 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-18-2017, 05:13 PM   #1
deanie
Junior Member
 
Location: Australia

Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 2
Default Dealing with technical replicates

First question, can anyone confirm these are indeed technical replicates?

3 blood samples taken from the same individual, each processed separately and final libraries pooled for sequencing (paired-end). So have a pair of fastq files for each of the replicates.

Second question, what are your opinions on how to deal with the technical replicates during differential expression analysis?

I've heard of technical replicates sequenced over different lanes and then combining the fastqs. In this lab's experiment there is no lane variation due to the multiplexing. Is it still sensible to combine them in the case described above?

Or separately process the fastqs for each replicate (i.e. qc, trimming, counts) and then combine the read counts? Based on what I read most people sum the counts of the technical replicates, with a few posts suggesting averaging them.

TIA!
deanie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2017, 01:56 AM   #2
gringer
David Eccles (gringer)
 
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 799
Default

It is a type of technical replicate, but will have some degree of biological variation from the different samples. Usually "technical replicate" refers to an additional sequencing library prepared from the same extract.

In this case because there is a chance of biological variation, I would keep the samples separate and add the sample as an additional factor in any statistical models.
gringer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2017, 01:30 PM   #3
deanie
Junior Member
 
Location: Australia

Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 2
Default

Thanks gringer. It does seem a little grey compared to other examples of technical and biological replicates I've seen. I expect the biological variation to be limited as it is a blood sample taken at once (i.e. fingerprick and three 10ul samples taken).
deanie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO