![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PubMed: Targeted next-generation sequencing for routine clinical screening of mutatio | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 0 | 09-14-2011 03:00 AM |
GenomeQuest Advances Whole Genome Sequencing to Clinical Diagnostics Reporting | GenomeQuest | Vendor Forum | 0 | 02-03-2011 11:17 AM |
PubMed: Next generation sequencing for clinical diagnostics-principles and applicatio | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 0 | 09-02-2010 11:10 AM |
Clinical Sequencing Software | gendxdoc | Bioinformatics | 1 | 04-26-2010 06:22 AM |
PubMed: High-throughput genome sequencing of two Listeria monocytogenes clinical isol | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 0 | 02-20-2010 03:00 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: cambridge Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 68
|
![]()
Just run a breast cancer sequencing sample on our PGM and got 15.2Mb.
Result. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: Oklahoma Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 411
|
![]()
But did it mean anything?
And how does the sequence impact the clinical side? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Moderator
Location: Oslo, Norway Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 415
|
![]()
Could you please (please?) share the read length distribution? I have asked Life for this and they just say '100 or 200bp'. Surely the real lengths are more variable?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Location: Guilford, CT and S.F., CA Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 64
|
![]()
Attached is a read length distribution for a single 314 run of E coli DH10B. Insert size on the library was about 120 bp.
There's more information on this run available in our Spring 2011 Performance Technical Note - available at iontorrent.com or in ioncommunity.iontorrent.com. Sincerely, mike lelivelt Director of Bioinformatics Ion Torrent - Life Technologies |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Location: Dronning Maud Land Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 129
|
![]()
If mean insert size was ~120 bases was the read trimmed to take off sequencing into the adapter or is that included in the read length distribution? I have been told quite tight size ranges for library insert sizes making the instrument less useful for doing QC on a Paired-end insert sized library.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Location: Boston area Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 747
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Location: USA Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 482
|
![]()
Okay so that is 0.5% of the human genome. I guess the personal genome machine will be sold to bacteria to sequence their personal genomes?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Junior Member
Location: Cambridge, UK Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3
|
![]()
We were using the old chemistry, what we are calling v1.2 (to match the s/ware version), and not the Xpress version that is out now. As to reads, we got 147508 with a mean length of 103bp.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Junior Member
Location: Cambridge, UK Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3
|
![]()
It did indeed mean something. As a first pass, proof of principle, it exceeded our expectations. All SNPs were concordant with our CE results including a small (pathogenic) deletion detected by CE as a heterozygous frame-shift. As for clinical impact, cost is a major factor and the 314 chip is not competitive compared to our CE approach. However, the 316 chip becomes significantly cheaper than CE if multiplexing is exploited sufficiently. The new chemistry and OneTouch automation should lessen the hands-on time and we can see how the Xpress chemistry improvements should result in further data quality improvements and reduce library processing. The biggest hit is in data analysis speed, something that costs a significant amount of time for a clinical scientist with CE data.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Junior Member
Location: Boston Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 5
|
![]()
I'm guessing this was amplicon sequencing? What was the average coverage depth across the sample? I know the PGM isn't supposed to have stellar accuracy, so depth becomes king.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Senior Member
Location: Oklahoma Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 411
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
Location: NikoNarita.jp Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 142
|
![]()
can some tell me what are the best read length , lib size, replicates and other standards for WGS PE Hiseq2000 of human samples. I am expecting complete best design without worrying about cost (I got funding) which will not make problem while analyzing data.
thank you in advance |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Member
Location: Alaska Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 49
|
![]()
This thread is a great concept, just like sequencing a chunk of heterogeneous cancer cells.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Senior Member
Location: NikoNarita.jp Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 142
|
![]()
any solution for my post please ?
http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthr...098#post112098 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|