![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
cufflinks : analysis comparison with and without a gtf reference file | sohnic | Bioinformatics | 3 | 07-07-2019 06:40 AM |
how to get a gtf file for cufflinks | camelbbs | Bioinformatics | 9 | 07-07-2019 06:30 AM |
Best source for GTF file for use with TopHat/Cufflinks | sdarko | Bioinformatics | 17 | 12-14-2012 12:48 PM |
cufflinks won't read my GTF file | moriah | Bioinformatics | 0 | 08-28-2011 01:31 AM |
Cufflinks' computation of FPKM for --GTF and --GTF-guide estimation | burt | Bioinformatics | 0 | 08-24-2011 12:59 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: Taiwan Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 17
|
![]()
The following is excepted from my gtf file, which is produced by Cufflinks:
chr21 Cufflinks transcript 14304464 14305055 1000 + . gene_id "CUFF.299"; transcript_id "CUFF.299.0"; RPKM "2357.2184844433"; frac "1.000000"; conf_lo "0.000000"; conf_hi "0.000000"; cov "19.187970"; chr21 Cufflinks exon 14304464 14304509 1000 + . gene_id "CUFF.299"; transcript_id "CUFF.299.0"; exon_number "1"; RPKM "2357.2184844433"; frac "1.000000"; conf_lo "0.000000"; conf_hi "0.000000"; cov "19.187970"; chr21 Cufflinks exon 14304969 14305055 1000 + . gene_id "CUFF.299"; transcript_id "CUFF.299.0"; exon_number "2"; RPKM "2357.2184844433"; frac "1.000000"; conf_lo "0.000000"; conf_hi "0.000000"; cov "19.187970"; chr21 Cufflinks transcript 14305973 14306356 1000 + . gene_id "CUFF.302"; transcript_id "CUFF.302.0"; RPKM "491.3950759106"; frac "1.000000"; conf_lo "0.000000"; conf_hi "0.000000"; cov "4.000000"; chr21 Cufflinks exon 14305973 14306002 1000 + . gene_id "CUFF.302"; transcript_id "CUFF.302.0"; exon_number "1"; RPKM "491.3950759106"; frac "1.000000"; conf_lo "0.000000"; conf_hi "0.000000"; cov "4.000000"; chr21 Cufflinks exon 14306312 14306356 1000 + . gene_id "CUFF.302"; transcript_id "CUFF.302.0"; exon_number "2"; RPKM "491.3950759106"; frac "1.000000"; conf_lo "0.000000"; conf_hi "0.000000"; cov "4.000000"; The "+" and "." forms mean "strand" and "frame". But how could "+/-/." express strand? Does "+" mean the "start-to-end" order and "-" mean "end-to-start" order? And how about "."? After searching, some other GTF files use "0/1/2" to express frame; however, Cufflinks uses "+/-/." to express. Do they match the same meanings? Thanks. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|