![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Inefficient ATAC-seq library prep amplification | lapensee | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 20 | 10-27-2020 11:06 AM |
A few questions about ATAC-seq library preparation. Thank you! | JDHelix | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 10 | 05-01-2019 05:14 AM |
Would you sequence this ATAC-seq library? | sasignor | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 1 | 05-21-2018 04:51 PM |
ATAC-seq library stability | elizatsou | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 1 | 04-15-2017 01:18 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: UK Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 8
|
![]()
Hi,
I am about to submit my first mouse ATAC-seq libraries for sequencing, but I have doubts regarding the number of libraries to pool in one 100bp paired-end HiSeq2500 Rapid Run. The Buenostro paper is suggesting >50M mapped reads per sample (in case of human genome), and the Rapid Run, according to Illumina's specifications, should yield "600 million paired end reads": https://emea.illumina.com/systems/se...fications.html My question is: does it mean I can pool 12 samples? Or did Buenostro mean 50 million pairs, which means 100 million reads per sample -- meaning I can only pool 6 samples in one run? Many thanks for helping to resolve this confusion. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: US Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 453
|
![]()
Hi Olga,
your math seems correct. Six samples to sequence about 50 million library molecules each. Buenrostro et al. generally refer to paired-reads in their papers. But you can certainly pool more libraries, analyze the data of the first lane, and then sequence additional lanes if needed. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
atac-seq, depth, illumina, pooling samples |
Thread Tools | |
|
|