![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ChIP-Seq: Discriminative prediction of mammalian enhancers from DNA sequence. | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 0 | 08-31-2011 03:00 AM |
How to define a expressed gene based on RNA-seq data | zeam | RNA Sequencing | 6 | 07-11-2011 02:27 PM |
RNA-Seq: Protocol dependence of sequencing-based gene expression measurements. | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 0 | 05-17-2011 03:10 AM |
RNA-Seq: Isoform-level microRNA-155 target prediction using RNA-seq. | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 0 | 02-15-2011 03:00 AM |
RNA-Seq: An integrative approach to genomic introgression mapping. | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 1 | 08-05-2010 07:42 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: San Francisco, CA Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 35
|
![]()
Hey everyone,
I am working on assembling a new reptile genome. I will have some pretty high coverage mRNA-seq data as well. Are there any standard gene prediction techniques that utilize both mRNA-seq data and genome sequence level data to predict genes? I found a program called Conrad that looks like it could do this kind of thing utilizing a conditional random field, but it doesn't look like it has been widely used, or maintained since 2009. Would the best option be to use separate programs to call genes using genome sequence information, and then again using the mRNA-seq information (cufflinks or something like that maybe?), and then I could go back and somehow merge the output form the two techniques? Are there any standard methods of performing this kind of merging? Gene annotation is another thing I will want to do with the output. I am going to hand annotate a few genes, but it would be useful if there was some kind of program that does a blast similarity based annotation with the remainder of genes. Thank you for your suggestions! -John |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: Southern France Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 269
|
![]()
AFAIK, not a lot of fully integrative methods our there. Looks like gene finding 15 years ago or so, when "ab initio" approaches (genomic sequence only) were distinct from "similarity" methods (transcripts alignments only).
I would use Cufflinks, or try Gmorse |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Location: Barcelona, Spain Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 38
|
![]()
AUGUSTUS is able to use RNA-Seq data and did a good job at gene prediction (at least in one plant genome). Problem is, one has to map reads using blat, which is not weapon of choice for fast and accurate spliced RNA-Seq mapping.
Problem: unspliced reads running over short introns |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Location: Bethesda MD Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 509
|
![]()
The approach you propose was used recently for assembly of a nematode genome. See http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20980554.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
gene annotation, gene prediction |
Thread Tools | |
|
|