![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Weird kmer distribution (using fastqc) | feralBiologist | Bioinformatics | 3 | 07-14-2013 06:20 AM |
FastQC: 3' bias (weird peaks) in Kmer content graphics | Ann7 | RNA Sequencing | 2 | 06-19-2013 06:31 AM |
FastQC Kmer content: spike in reverse read | reubennowell | Bioinformatics | 4 | 06-12-2013 03:56 AM |
FastQC: odd kmer content | zshuhua | Introductions | 3 | 05-13-2013 08:36 PM |
kmer content warning in FastQC | vallejov | RNA Sequencing | 0 | 04-05-2013 11:10 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: South Africa Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5
|
![]()
Hi all,
I sequenced a genome on the Illumina MiSeq using paired ends. When analyzing the second read in FastQC, there is a steady increase of a over represented kmer (GGGGG). Does anyone know what would cause this effect and whether it is indicative of an underlying problem? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: uk Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 667
|
![]()
I have sometimes seen stretches of poly G (as well as poly A) when the inserts are very short and you read into the Illumina adapters, and then past the end of the adapters.
Does the GGGGG kmer remain if you quality trim your reads and remove adapters? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Location: South Africa Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5
|
![]()
The GGGGG kmer does disappear after trimming.
I just wondered what could be the cause of such a artifact. Thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Location: uk Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 667
|
![]()
once you get past the end of the adapters, it is either complete rubbish, or the sequences on the flow cell.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
fastqc, kmer |
Thread Tools | |
|
|