|
|
|
|
|||||||
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Multiplexing BluePippin size selection | filipeuit | Illumina/Solexa | 3 | 05-14-2018 04:39 AM |
| Variants called using GATK from samples of Nextera and TruSeq exome enrichment kits | bioinf newbie | Illumina/Solexa | 1 | 11-01-2016 05:00 AM |
| BluePippin issue | matth431 | General | 0 | 11-25-2014 03:13 AM |
| nextera kits | seqgirl123 | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 1 | 04-15-2013 10:27 AM |
| Nextera kits | HMorrison | 454 Pyrosequencing | 3 | 11-01-2011 01:00 PM |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
09-27-2018, 07:03 AM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Location: US Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 14
|
BluePippin use w/ Nextera Kits
Always used BluePippin with XT kit, as a two-step size selection. Trying out the new Flex kit. Since the protocol calls for a set/given amount of beads in the Flex kit, will the BluePippin size selection be overkill? Has anyone used the two in combination? Does it work better or is the Flex kit best used alone? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
09-28-2018, 06:10 AM
|
#2 |
|
Jafar Jabbari
Location: Melbourne Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,238
|
Nextera DNA Flex workflow includes a double SPRI size selection. A Pippin size selection will reduce library diversity and is not required unless you have a specific application that needs tight size selection.
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
