SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Applications Forums > Sample Prep / Library Generation



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rn/cycles: qPCR decided ATAC-seq library amplification zhaolin Sample Prep / Library Generation 7 03-13-2019 01:12 AM
ATAC-seq library stability elizatsou Sample Prep / Library Generation 1 04-15-2017 12:18 PM
ATAC-Seq cell preparation from Tissue paramita7 Sample Prep / Library Generation 4 10-24-2016 07:37 AM
trouble with RNA seq library preparation sujageorge Sample Prep / Library Generation 0 11-15-2012 03:49 PM
SOLiD 4 ChIP-seq library preparation ETHANol SOLiD 1 05-05-2011 06:28 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-13-2017, 09:47 AM   #1
JDHelix
Junior Member
 
Location: Canada

Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3
Question A few questions about ATAC-seq library preparation. Thank you!

Hi everyone,

I've done my first ATAC-seq library preparation recently and had a few questions about the result. I would be very grateful if anyone could kindly give me some feedback/suggestions.

I used 50,000 HEK cells (fresh cells), and followed Buenrostro JD, et al. 2015 protocol exactly. After nuclei preparation -> Tn5 tagmentation (37C, 30min, on a heating block) -> PCR amplification (total cycle number was 11), I purified library with QIAGEN MinElute PCR Purification Kit and eluted in 20ul elution buffer provided by the kit. I loaded 10ul, 5ul, and 2.5ul samples on a 2% agarose gel (containing GelRed) to visualize the bands. Please see attached image.

I can see a nucleosome-like pattern at expected sizes, but not very strong. I'm wondering:
1. Is this result good enough for sequencing? Should I further optimize the condition (e.g. titrate Tn5 enzyme)?
2. There is a strong band below 100 bp (the lowest one), but I have no idea what it is. Could it be primer dimers? I have purified the library before running the gel, so I didn't expect to see primer dimers...
3. I expected to see strong signals below 150 bp, which come from sub-nucleosomal DNAs. However, I hardly see anything between 150 bp and the lowest band (indicated by a red square bracket in the image), even no background smear. Does anyone have similar experience and know why?

Thank you so much! Any comments would be highly appreciated!

Best,
Dan
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Dan Jin 2017-03-09 10hr 57min_Edit_inverted_s.jpg (95.2 KB, 159 views)
JDHelix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2017, 07:27 AM   #2
achouak
Junior Member
 
Location: baltimore

Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 2
Default

hi,
i have a problem like you for atac seq. i am working in the same condition as the paper 2015 but i can not find the best results. i have many variations.
for some samples (fresh cells from mice) i can find many bands after run the gel but many others i can not i just find a large bands >1kb.
i tested 50000, 100000 and 300000 cells. i think it is better with 50000.
would you please tell what steps i have to change or to adapt to have more best results.
change our idea to ameliorate our results.
Achouak
achouak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2017, 09:04 AM   #3
JDHelix
Junior Member
 
Location: Canada

Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3
Default

Hi achouak,

I'm also a new user for ATAC-seq experiment.
Usually, ATAC-seq needs 500 - 50,000 cells. I think you probably have used too many cells in some cases. According to the paper, using too many cells causes underdigestion and creates high-molecular-weight fragments. It also makes sense that 50,000 cells worked better in your hand. If I were you, I would try fewer cells.
Good luck!

Best,
Dan
JDHelix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2019, 04:57 AM   #4
Marķa Camila Fetiva
Junior Member
 
Location: Germany

Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 8
Default

Hello,

Nowadays I am also having similar problems in my ATAC-seq protocol i don't have the banding pattern, could you finally resolve it and perform the ATAC-seq?.

Can you give me some suggestions?


Camila
Marķa Camila Fetiva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2019, 09:12 AM   #5
JDHelix
Junior Member
 
Location: Canada

Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3
Default

Hi Camila,

First of all, I was wondering which protocol you were using? Howard Lab and Greenleaf Lab have published an improved ATAC-Seq protocol in 2017 (Corces, M. R. et al. An improved ATAC-seq protocol reduces background and enables interrogation of frozen tissues. Nat. Methods 6–8 (2017). doi:10.1038/nmeth.4396) which works much better than the original one. If you were still using their original ATAC-Seq protocol, I highly recommend that you try the new protocol.

Good luck,
Dan
JDHelix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2019, 12:56 PM   #6
atpoint
Member
 
Location: Muenster

Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 14
Default

The original ATAC-seq protocol is very robust, and if you do it properly for human or murine cells you'll see the banding pattern. All these modifications in the newer protocols might improve the output but are not critical. If there is a problem, you'll not solve it by changing protocols. The only really essential addition from the newer protocols is the addition of Tween-20 at 0.1% to both lysis and transposition buffers as this really and notably decreased mitochondrial contamination from e.g. 80% to like 15% in our (and collaborators) hands. The other additions are rather minor in effect size. Camila, can you give details on your cells, the protocol and upload a bioanalyzer pic?
atpoint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2019, 04:49 AM   #7
Marķa Camila Fetiva
Junior Member
 
Location: Germany

Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 8
Default

Hello this is the result I obtained and corresponds to sample number 1 please ignore the others.
I am following Buenrostro protocol in 50.000 cells. I did first 5 PCR cycles and next I added 20 PCR cycles.

I am not sure if this results is ok.

Thanks for your opinions and suggestions
Attached Files
File Type: pdf 20190227_Fragment analizer.pdf (444.4 KB, 47 views)
Marķa Camila Fetiva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2019, 11:13 AM   #8
misgana
Junior Member
 
Location: Alabama

Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 1
Default

Hi JDHelix,
I was wondering if you have taken into consideration that the adaptor sequences add extra 124 bp to you PCR product. May be that is why you don't see sub-nuclesomal size on your gel. Moreover, it will be wise to use 5% polyacrylamide gel rather than agarose for your electrophoresis.
misgana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2019, 12:33 PM   #9
Marķa Camila Fetiva
Junior Member
 
Location: Germany

Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 8
Default

thanks for your reply, do you think this Lybrary look ok? or there is not banding pattern, i am not sure if it is ok to sequence.
Marķa Camila Fetiva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2019, 05:18 PM   #10
narulam
Junior Member
 
Location: CA

Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1
Default

Hi Maria,

According to the protocol, you should do 5 cycles and an additional number of cycles based on the calculation from the qPCR done only on 5 uL of your PCR product for 20 cycles. If you're doing a total of 25 cycles for your entire DNA, you're probably over amplifying it which is not good for sequencing as it leads to bias toward few bp lengths. You should technically not amplify your DNA for more than 15 cycles total (including the initial 5 cycles). Hope this helps.
narulam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2019, 04:14 AM   #11
SUKALPA
Junior Member
 
Location: INDIA

Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 1
Default

This look fine.
SUKALPA is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
atac-seq, library preparation, tagmentation, tn5

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO