Go Back   SEQanswers > Bioinformatics > Bioinformatics

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Illumina FASTQ Quality Scores - Missing Value Bio.X2Y Bioinformatics 24 08-29-2013 07:01 AM
Ideas on collecting quality scores per base in an illumina fastq file brachysclereid Bioinformatics 11 12-05-2011 01:00 PM
GATK base quality recalibration suppose to keep old and new quality scores? Heisman Bioinformatics 2 10-21-2011 07:40 AM
Illumina quality scores dlepp Illumina/Solexa 6 02-28-2011 11:09 PM
Illumina quality scores ewilbanks Bioinformatics 3 11-10-2010 08:52 AM

Thread Tools
Old 10-18-2010, 03:58 AM   #1
Graham Etherington
Location: Norwich, England.

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 22
Default Illumina 1.3 v 1.8 quality scores

Is there/should there be any difference in the quality score format between Illumina 1.3 reads an Illumina 1.8 reads?
Many thanks,
Graham Etherington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2010, 07:00 AM   #2
Senior Member
Location: USA, Midwest

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,165

If you mean the format with which Illumina encodes the quality score in their FASTQ files then no, there is no difference. All versions of the Illumina base calling software since pipeline 1.3 (both RTA and OLB) use the ASCII(Phred+64) encoding scheme.

There are however differences in the range of Q-scores you will see in the Illumina output. Check the FASTQ article on Wikipedia and you will see that they made a change at 1.5. It also seems that they made a change in going from 1.6 to 1.8. In 1.6 the maximum Q-score assigned appeared to be 34. Now in 1.8 it is 40.
kmcarr is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO