Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Error during PicardMarkDuplicates (Illumina paired-ends mapped by Bfast)

    I mapped one run of Illumina paired end reads by using Bfast (bwaaln + localalign + postprocess), then converted it to bam, performed the Picard AddOrReplaceReadGroups command plus Samtools sort/index and therefore, when executing Picard MarkDuplicates, I have the following error:

    Code:
    Exception in thread "main" net.sf.picard.PicardException: Value was put into PairInfoMap more than once.  3: grouped_reads:HWUSI-EAS1692_0001:1:1:1841:8839#0
        at net.sf.picard.sam.CoordinateSortedPairInfoMap.ensureSequenceLoaded(CoordinateSortedPairInfoMap.java:124)
        at net.sf.picard.sam.CoordinateSortedPairInfoMap.remove(CoordinateSortedPairInfoMap.java:78)
        at net.sf.picard.sam.DiskReadEndsMap.remove(DiskReadEndsMap.java:61)
        at net.sf.picard.sam.MarkDuplicates.buildSortedReadEndLists(MarkDuplicates.java:285)
        at net.sf.picard.sam.MarkDuplicates.doWork(MarkDuplicates.java:113)
        at net.sf.picard.cmdline.CommandLineProgram.instanceMain(CommandLineProgram.java:157)
        at net.sf.picard.sam.MarkDuplicates.main(MarkDuplicates.java:97)
    I've noticed that the reads outputted by the bfast-postprocess looks like HWUSI-EAS1692_0001:2:1:1025:14826#0, whereas the original reads indicates the pair-end by either HWUSI-EAS1692_0001:2:1:1025:14826#0/1 or HWUSI-EAS1692_0001:2:1:1025:14826#0/2, I guess it is related, but I do not know how to solve this.

    Any help will be appreciated, many thanks in advance!

    David

  • #2
    Could you create a test case with only the offending reads (in SAM format)?

    Comment


    • #3
      I've created a file just with the reads pointed out in the MarkDuplicates error, and the same message error appears when running the Picard command. Also, I've created a SAM file with only these reads removed and the same error appears but with another read ID. I would say that MarkDuplicates does not allow more than one mapped position per read in the input file, therefore, I've forced just an unique alignement per read in the bfast postprocess command by changing the value of the "-a" argument:

      previously, the command was:

      Code:
      bfast postprocess -i  input.baf -f hg19.fa -a 0 -A 0 -R -O 1 -n 4 -U >  output.sam
      I changed it to:

      Code:
      bfast postprocess -i  input.baf -f hg19.fa -a 3 -z -A 0 -R -O 1 -n 4 -U >  output.sam
      Now the Picard MarkDuplicates command works fine. Hope it makes sense.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • seqadmin
        Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
        by seqadmin


        Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
        04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
      • seqadmin
        Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
        by seqadmin


        Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
        03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
      0 responses
      24 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
      0 responses
      25 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
      0 responses
      21 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
      0 responses
      52 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Working...
      X