![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Low input/adaptor dimers | whw | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 6 | 11-01-2011 12:26 PM |
removal of primer dimers. | shurjo | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 2 | 07-08-2011 02:12 PM |
Avoiding primer dimers | lpalacios | 454 Pyrosequencing | 9 | 05-05-2011 02:24 AM |
PubMed: Extraction of high molecular weight DNA from microbial mats. | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 0 | 09-22-2010 03:00 AM |
Primer Dimers in PEIn libraries | Bruce E | Illumina/Solexa | 1 | 04-14-2010 06:46 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: Berkeley, CA Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2
|
![]()
I recently ran a Low Molecular Weight sample on our 454 and got a bad result. Most of the sequences were just primer dimers. Our samples are pooled PCR products, 200-600 bp in length. The LMW protocol says to skip the AMPure size selection/cleanup step after adapter ligation, but this allows primer dimers to be sequenced.
I want to eliminate the primer dimers, but I am afraid that if I do the AMPure cleanup, I will loose part of my sample DNA. Any ideas about how to eliminate the primer dimers for the LMW sample? I have attached a plot of the sequence read lengths from the last run. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Location: Germany Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 33
|
![]()
Hi, if you don't want to use Ampure clean-up or gel extraction (I'm just assuming this would drop out for the same reasons), did you think about something like using a Centricon (or Microcon)? Millipore claims that they cannot only be used for proteins, but also provides DNA cut-off sizes:
Centricon-30 ssDNA cot-off: 60 nt, dsDNA cut-off: 50 bp I think I have read something like 90% retention. I guess every additional step will not have 100% yield, but is that necessary? If your samples are PCR products, you should have plenty of everything. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
adapter, ampure, low molecular weight, primer dimer, size selection |
Thread Tools | |
|
|