![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Using Clean NGS from proteigene for RNA clean up of single cell | Kaizen | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 0 | 07-31-2017 01:00 AM |
blast final report | mido1951 | Bioinformatics | 9 | 11-08-2015 04:58 AM |
Ampure bead clean up | anna_m | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 7 | 06-20-2013 04:47 AM |
Troubleshooting EZ Bead vs manual bead prep | pmiguel | SOLiD | 0 | 01-18-2011 07:33 AM |
Bead preparation for "GS Junior" with ABI EZ Bead Dystem | Nelix | 454 Pyrosequencing | 1 | 06-18-2010 01:09 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Location: Oxford, Ohio Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 253
|
![]()
Hello,
I have a general question regarding NGS library prep protocols; many of the protocols suggest using TWO rounds of bead clean-up at the end of the protocol. I am curious as to why TWO (2) rounds of clean-up. Shouldn't one "proper" iteration (round) be enough? Or are the companies worried about primer dimers so much that they are trying to CTAs and suggest two rounds? Thanks-in-advance... Last edited by cement_head; 10-30-2019 at 08:21 AM. Reason: clarification |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
josh kinman
Location: Austin Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 71
|
![]()
I have seen many PCR Free protocols recommend two cleanups to be sure to get rid of any unincorporated adapters which are hard to detect and known to cause index hopping.
This could also be needed after PCR for protocols that use PCR primers that include index sequences.
__________________
Josh Kinman |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Location: US Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 452
|
![]()
Yep, bead cleanups will never be perfect. You can only enrich for molecules of the desired size range.
Many protocols suggest two rounds of bead cleanups likey to safeguard for less than optimal experiments that created too many adapter dimers. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
bead clean-up, ngs library prep |
Thread Tools | |
|
|