SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Sequencing Technologies/Companies > Illumina/Solexa



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aligners for Illumina's mate-pairs Margarida Bioinformatics 8 07-29-2013 09:28 AM
Mate pair libraries with longer read length rakesh.ponnala Illumina/Solexa 4 01-16-2012 02:41 PM
Simulate Illumina read-pairs gene coder Bioinformatics 4 07-07-2011 03:37 AM
de novo assembly and Illumina read length bkingham De novo discovery 1 11-16-2009 11:15 PM
De novo fragment assembly with short mate-paired reads, Does the read length matter? strob Literature Watch 3 10-23-2009 01:36 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-07-2010, 05:28 AM   #1
Linnea
Member
 
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 23
Default Read length for Illumina mate pairs

Hey all,

I've heard that with the new, longer Illumina reads (>100bp), for mate-pair sequencing the amount of chimeric reads has increased strikingly. (Because it is much more likely to read over the junction). Is this true? Anyone having experience from this?

I've searched for information, but the only thing I found was a quite old post saying that Illumina doesn't recommend longer read length than 36bp for mate-pair sequencing.

We are about to sequence one full flowcell of Illumina mate-pairs, and the default read length is now 109bp - will this work or is it better to choose a shorter read length, like 36 or 50bp?

Any advice would be appreciated!
Linnea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2010, 07:16 PM   #2
kmcarr
Senior Member
 
Location: USA, Midwest

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,177
Default

Illumina has not changed its recommendation for read lengths of mate-pair libraries. From the MatePair_v2_2-5kb_SamplePrep_Guide_15008135_A:
Quote:
When sequencing a mate pair library, Illumina recommends a read length no
longer than 36 bases. A longer read length elevates error rates, because
longer reads are more likely to cross over the junction of the two joined ends
of a size-selected fragment. The Illumina analysis pipeline discards these
junction reads, since they do not align to the reference sequence.
While the Illumina platform is capable of generating longer reads they are not appropriate for every application. Mate-pair data is not meant to provide large amounts of coverage. Coverage should be generated with long reads from paired end (or single end) libraries. A small amount of mate-pair data is then combined with these to order contigs into scaffolds.

What are you sequencing? Is it de novo? (I would assume so if you are doing mate pair.) Do you have any other sequence data you will be combining with this?

Last edited by kmcarr; 06-08-2010 at 07:18 PM.
kmcarr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2010, 11:46 PM   #3
Linnea
Member
 
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 23
Default

Thanks for the reply!

I hadn't seen that SamplePrep guide. Then we'll go for 36bp!

Yes, we're doing de novo and we allready have two full flowcells sequenced with paired-ends, so the current assembly has a coverage of ~40X. The mate-pair flowcell is just for scaffolding so I guess the coverage of that isn't too important.

Cheers,
Linnéa
Linnea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO