Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BLAST sequence comparing

    A human protein sequence was compared to a human mRNA sequence using TBLASTN. All amino acids of the protein were matched with 100% identity, but the first (5’) and last (3’) parts of the
    mRNA were not included in the alignment, is this because of the UTRs?

    When the same mRNA was used in a BLASTN search against the human genome all the mRNA was matched but the alignment was split up in several alignments (HSPs).Why is this?

    The human mRNA was compared with BLASTN to the orthologous mRNA from mouse, but BLASTN did not produce any alignment. Why?

    I am a beginner in the subject and grateful for answers!

  • #2
    Originally posted by Britta View Post

    When the same mRNA was used in a BLASTN search against the human genome all the mRNA was matched but the alignment was split up in several alignments (HSPs).Why is this?
    The genomic DNA has introns, which are spliced out from the mRNA.

    Originally posted by Britta View Post
    The human mRNA was compared with BLASTN to the orthologous mRNA from mouse, but BLASTN did not produce any alignment. Why?
    Could be that the score for the alignment did not meet the cutoff values for the parameters used in the blast search, like evalue, or percent identity.

    Comment


    • #3
      Is this your homework?

      Originally posted by Britta View Post
      A human protein sequence was compared to a human mRNA sequence using TBLASTN. All amino acids of the protein were matched with 100% identity, but the first (5’) and last (3’) parts of the
      mRNA were not included in the alignment, is this because of the UTRs?
      Could be.

      When the same mRNA was used in a BLASTN search against the human genome all the mRNA was matched but the alignment was split up in several alignments (HSPs).Why is this?
      Introns?

      The human mRNA was compared with BLASTN to the orthologous mRNA from mouse, but BLASTN did not produce any alignment. Why?
      The gene has changed extensively in one of the lineages and no homology can be inferred from the nt level? Could be a million other things..
      savetherhino.org

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Britta View Post

        The human mRNA was compared with BLASTN to the orthologous mRNA from mouse, but BLASTN did not produce any alignment. Why?
        If you are looking at a true ortholog it is surprising that the "functional" bits do not match.

        Look at the homologene section from NCBI site (as example here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/homologene/132386). Perhaps NCBI has already done the work for you.

        Comment


        • #5
          Thanks for the answers!

          No, it is not homework, but its tasks from a book and I don´t have anyone to correct me so I wanted to see if I was on the right track.

          The last question,
          "The human mRNA was compared with BLASTN to the orthologous mRNA from mouse, but BLASTN did not produce any alignment. Why?"

          I thought that the nucleotide sequence was not conserved, but if comparing similar protein in BLASTP, they would still be able to show similarities because different nucleotide sequences can give rise to identical / similar amino acid sequences. Is that all wrong?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Britta View Post
            Thanks for the answers!



            I thought that the nucleotide sequence was not conserved, but if comparing similar protein in BLASTP, they would still be able to show similarities because different nucleotide sequences can give rise to identical / similar amino acid sequences. Is that all wrong?
            No, you are right.

            There are 64 codons but only 20 amino acids, so there is some redundancy in the genetic code.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • seqadmin
              Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
              by seqadmin


              Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
              04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
            • seqadmin
              Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
              by seqadmin


              Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
              03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
            0 responses
            25 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
            0 responses
            28 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
            0 responses
            24 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
            0 responses
            52 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Working...
            X