Go Back   SEQanswers > Applications Forums > RNA Sequencing

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Illumina vs. Agilent Exome enrichment - higher false positive rates markusl Genomic Resequencing 9 09-22-2016 08:22 AM
samtools false positive/negative dnusol Bioinformatics 0 11-08-2011 08:13 AM
ChIP-Seq: False positive peaks in ChIP-seq and other sequencing-based functional assa Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 06-29-2011 02:10 PM
SNPs false positive GATK jtrivino Bioinformatics 0 05-06-2011 04:28 AM
ti/tv ratio and false positive SNP rate yi2004 Bioinformatics 5 06-21-2010 03:07 AM

Thread Tools
Old 10-30-2011, 10:37 AM   #1
Junior Member
Location: Atlanta

Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1
Default tophatfusion false positive results

Hi guys:
I use the command in the online manual and run tophatfusion on the sample MCF7 cell line in the paper. However, it seems the detected fusion contains much more positive results than what has been presented in the paper.
Anyone has some ideas about this?
lichenbiostat is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO