Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Testing a force topology in mrBayes

    Hello Everybody,


    I have a question related to "Testing a topological hypothesis". I have
    tried to run the same procedure as mentioned in the tutorial in order to
    check whether two species form monophyletic group or not. As far as i
    understand the manual- - by setting hard constraint we are forcing two
    species to form a monophyletic group every time. And by setting the
    negative constraint we should reproduce the original topology. However, In
    my case , after running the analysis as mentioned in the manual- both hard
    and negative constraint are producing the same tree. After running the
    stepping stone analysis, i am getting some weird output in log file:-

    "24600 -- [nan] (nan) (nan) (nan) * [nan] (nan) (nan) (nan) (...0 remote
    chains"

    Run Marginal likelihood (ln)
    ------------------------------
    1 nan
    2 nan
    ------------------------------
    Mean: nan

    As I am running the entire analysis on the cluster. So, here's the command
    i am using for this analysis:-

    "begin mrbayes;
    set autoclose=yes nowarn=yes;
    execute Set1_Out_Ehist_Concat.nexus;
    lset rates=invgamma;
    constraint subell = Asub Aell;
    constraint nosubell = Asub Aell;
    prset topologypr = constraints(subell);
    mcmc ngen=100000 samplefreq=100 printfreq=100 diagnfreq=1000
    file=PositiveConstraint;
    sump burnin=25000;
    sumt burnin=25000;
    prset topologypr = constraints(nosubell);
    mcmc ngen=100000 samplefreq=100 printfreq=100 diagnfreq=1000
    file=NegativeConstraint;
    sump burnin=25000;
    sumt burnin=25000;
    prset topologypr = constraints(subell);
    ss ngen=250000 diagnfreq=2500 filename=positive;
    prset topologypr = constraints(nosubell);
    ss filename=negative;
    quit;
    end;
    "

    Here the Asub and Aell are the two species name that i want to be force to
    form a monophyletic group in the hard constraint.


    Now I don't understand what is happening here. And my questions are :-

    1) Why i am getting the same tree after setting hard and negative
    constraint?
    2) What does this "*nan"* mean in the stepping stone analysis?
    3) How do i known if the procedure i am running is correct or not?


    As these question making me very confuse now. So I would highly appreciate
    any help and clarification on this questions. I have also posted this question on the mrbayes mailing list[http://sourceforge.net/p/mrbayes/mai...age/34174009/] as well as biostar[https://www.biostars.org/p/145595/], but i didn't get any reply.

    Very much looking forward for the answer

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
    by seqadmin


    Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
    04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
  • seqadmin
    Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
    by seqadmin


    Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
    03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
0 responses
22 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
0 responses
24 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
0 responses
19 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
0 responses
50 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X