Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Low DNA yield after adapter ligation

    Hi guys,

    I am generating RRBS library recently. In the whole process I use Beckman Ampure Xp beads to purify (cleanup and elute) DNA. But only the step of adapter ligation showed a extremely low efficiency of DNA yield (~35%).

    The efficiencies of End repair and Add A steps are very good (over 90%). Do you have any experience about that? What should I do to improve the efficiency after adapter ligation?

    Thank you so much!

  • #2
    Hello Reprogrammer,
    It is going to be hard to answer this question without more information.

    Can you describe the protocol that you are using?
    Listing your steps and including the sample and bead volumes that you are using for your cleanups would be a good start.
    Josh Kinman

    Comment


    • #3
      Ligation efficiency will depend a lot on the appropriate adapter concentration. Do you see any adapter dimers after the ligation.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by jdk787 View Post
        Hello Reprogrammer,
        It is going to be hard to answer this question without more information.

        Can you describe the protocol that you are using?
        Listing your steps and including the sample and bead volumes that you are using for your cleanups would be a good start.
        Hi jdk787,

        I summarized my protocol and put it in the attachment. Would you help me take a look is there anything wrong, please?
        Thank you so much.
        Attached Files

        Comment


        • #5
          I noticed that I made a conceptual mistake. What I am doing is whole-genome DNA methylation but not RRBS since I am using sonication biorupter to fragment genomic DNA.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by reprogrammer View Post
            Hi jdk787,

            I summarized my protocol and put it in the attachment. Would you help me take a look is there anything wrong, please?
            Thank you so much.
            Hello Reprogrammer,
            Sorry for the delayed response, I've been out of town.
            One big problem that I see is that you are trying to blunt, phosphorylate, and A-tail your DNA using just Klenow Fragment (3-5 exo)
            This enzyme is recommended for A tailing previously blunted and phosphorylated DNA, not blunting and A-tailing.

            You need to blunt your DNA first, and then A-tail.

            Also, you should check to make sure that your fragmented DNA is in a size range that is compatible with your protocol by either running a portion of it on a gel or BA. If you are over fragmenting your starting material you may be losing it during your cleanups.

            For your PCR amplification, I think you can skip the Ampure cleanup after the post conversion column cleanup and just go straight in to PCR.

            Finally, you need to make sure that you are using a Uracil literate Taq for your amplification since you will have C -> U conversions in your template.

            If you want an easier and more straight forward way to make your libraries, many companies sell kits that will supply you with the protocol and all of reagents that you need to perform WGBS and RRBS library prep. Kapa, Illumina, and Bioo Scientific (where I work) to name a few.

            Feel free to PM me if you would like info on the Bioo Scientific kit.
            Josh Kinman

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by jdk787 View Post
              Hello Reprogrammer,
              Sorry for the delayed response, I've been out of town.
              One big problem that I see is that you are trying to blunt, phosphorylate, and A-tail your DNA using just Klenow Fragment (3-5 exo)
              This enzyme is recommended for A tailing previously blunted and phosphorylated DNA, not blunting and A-tailing.

              You need to blunt your DNA first, and then A-tail.

              Also, you should check to make sure that your fragmented DNA is in a size range that is compatible with your protocol by either running a portion of it on a gel or BA. If you are over fragmenting your starting material you may be losing it during your cleanups.

              For your PCR amplification, I think you can skip the Ampure cleanup after the post conversion column cleanup and just go straight in to PCR.

              Finally, you need to make sure that you are using a Uracil literate Taq for your amplification since you will have C -> U conversions in your template.

              If you want an easier and more straight forward way to make your libraries, many companies sell kits that will supply you with the protocol and all of reagents that you need to perform WGBS and RRBS library prep. Kapa, Illumina, and Bioo Scientific (where I work) to name a few.

              Feel free to PM me if you would like info on the Bioo Scientific kit.
              Hi jdk787,

              Thank you so much for your suggestion. Finally I got the PCR product with your guidance.

              First I changed the Taq enzyme to Cx Pfu, I believe this is the major mistake I made. At the beginning I used the PrimeStat which could not recognize U in the template DNA after bisulfite conversion. Second, I over amplified the template DNA with 40 cycles to make sure the product was exist. I am trying to reduce the PCR cycles to 20~25 now.

              For the commercial kit, I am contacting with NuGen company which my friend used pretty well with 25 ng DNA input.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • seqadmin
                Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
                by seqadmin


                The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist on Modified Bases...
                Yesterday, 07:01 AM
              • seqadmin
                Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
                by seqadmin


                Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
                04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
              0 responses
              39 views
              0 likes
              Last Post seqadmin  
              Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
              0 responses
              41 views
              0 likes
              Last Post seqadmin  
              Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
              0 responses
              35 views
              0 likes
              Last Post seqadmin  
              Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
              0 responses
              55 views
              0 likes
              Last Post seqadmin  
              Working...
              X