SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > General



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Canu sensitivity to genomeSize parameter jpummil Bioinformatics 1 09-28-2016 02:31 PM
enzyme combination in rice.. anyone tried PstI / MspI ? odoyle81 Bioinformatics 0 11-27-2013 09:04 AM
calculation of sensitivity and specificity happy2000 Bioinformatics 3 06-10-2011 05:26 AM
Sensitivity of Mutant Detection srr8623 Illumina/Solexa 0 07-14-2010 03:05 PM
Papers on the sensitivity of mRNA-seq? liux Bioinformatics 3 05-17-2010 10:27 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-10-2017, 10:02 AM   #1
anjama
Junior Member
 
Location: Florida

Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 7
Default PstI methylation sensitivity

So my lab is in the process of understanding and implementing a protocol for several species. One point of confusion we are trying to figure out is whether or not the PstI restriction enzyme is methylation sensitive. The reason this is a concern is that the protocol calls for methylation sensitive enzymes, and people involved in developing the protocol use PstI as a methylation-sensitive enzyme for a variety of species ranging from plants to mammals. However, the product pages for Fisher and NEB both list PstI as not sensitive for dam, dcm, and CpG sites. The only indication I can see on manufacturer sites that it is sensitive is a reference chart on Promega's website that lists it as sensitive to CpNpG methylation sites.

Just taking a quick look through primary literature, many papers seem to refer to PstI as methylation sensitive, but I've also seen some that refer to it as non-sensitive. From what I gather, CpNpG sites are predominately a plant thing, whereas the mammal genome consists of primarily CpG sites (I think I saw the number 97% somewhere), which seems like it explains the discrepancy between different papers. Is this right? Is it correct to consider PstI non-methylation sensitive for mammals, but methylation sensitive for plants? Or am I missing something? Thanks
anjama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2017, 04:15 PM   #2
SNPsaurus
Registered Vendor
 
Location: Eugene, OR

Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 400
Default

For RAD-Seq work in plants, PstI acts as if it is methylation-sensitive, as you'll get a number of cut sites sequenced that is consistent with the genome being several hundred megabases in size, regardless of the actual genome size (plants have a small amount of non-repetitive DNA with most of the variation in size coming from methylated repeats).

PstI cut sites tend to scale with genome size in mammals, so it acts insensitive there. These are not direct tests of sensitivity, of course, but it is consistent with the enzyme companies sites. So you are correct, I'd say!
__________________
Providing nextRAD genotyping services. http://snpsaurus.com
SNPsaurus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
psti, restriction enzyme

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO