SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Literature Watch



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
experimental versus control enrichemnt for chip seq data novino11 Bioinformatics 1 06-16-2011 07:04 AM
ChIP-Seq: ChIP-Array: combinatory analysis of ChIP-seq/chip and microarray gene expre Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 05-19-2011 02:50 AM
W-ChIPeaks: A web application for processing ChIP-chip and ChIP-seq data buckeye3947 Bioinformatics 0 01-24-2011 01:05 PM
ChIP-Seq: ChIPpeakAnno: a Bioconductor package to annotate ChIP-seq and ChIP-chip dat Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 05-13-2010 02:00 AM
PubMed: An integrated software system for analyzing ChIP-chip and ChIP-seq data. Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 11-04-2008 05:03 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-02-2011, 02:50 AM   #1
Newsbot!
RSS Posting Maniac
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,438
Default ChIP-Seq: ChIP-chip versus ChIP-seq: Lessons for experimental design and data analysi

Syndicated from PubMed RSS Feeds

ChIP-chip versus ChIP-seq: Lessons for experimental design and data analysis.

BMC Genomics. 2011 Feb 28;12(1):134

Authors: Ho JW, Bishop E, Kharchenko PV, Negre N, White KP, Park PJ

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) followed by microarray hybridization (ChIP-chip) or high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq) allows genome-wide discovery of protein-DNA interactions such as transcription factor bindings and histone modifications. Previous reports only compared a small number of profiles, and little has been done to compare histone modification profiles generated by the two technologies or to assess the impact of input DNA libraries in ChIP-seq analysis. Here, we performed a systematic analysis of a modENCODE dataset consisting of 31 pairs of ChIP-chip/ChIP-seq profiles of the coactivator CBP, RNA polymerase II (RNA PolII), and six histone modifications across four developmental stages of Drosophila melanogaster. RESULTS: Both technologies produce highly reproducible profiles within each platform, ChIP-seq generally produces profiles with a better signal-to-noise ratio, and allows detection of more peaks and narrower peaks. The set of peaks identified by the two technologies can be significantly different, but the extent to which they differ varies depending on the factor and the analysis algorithm. Importantly, we found that there is a significant variation among multiple sequencing profiles of input DNA libraries and that this variation most likely arises from both differences in experimental condition and sequencing depth. We further show that using an inappropriate input DNA profile can impact the average signal profiles around genomic features and peak calling results, highlighting the importance of having high quality input DNA data for normalization in ChIP-seq analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the biases present in each of the platforms, show the variability that can arise from both technology and analysis methods, and emphasize the importance of obtaining high quality and deeply sequenced input DNA libraries for ChIP-seq analysis.

PMID: 21356108 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]



More...
Newsbot! is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO