Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • mRNA fragmentation

    Does anyone have an opinion whether the Ambion RNA fragmentation kit works well for RNA-SEQ. The documentation says it produces fragments of 60-200 bp. Any suggestions on parameters/incubation time to increase fragment size or other recommendation for chemical shearing?

  • #2
    The ambion fragmentation kit will work fine. It is essentially a buffer containing Zn2+ as the metal ion, among other minor components. The ends of your fragmented RNA will not be compatible for ligation-based library prep methods until you further treat the fragmented RNA with T4 polynucleotide kinase and ATP. Chemical fragmentation results in 5' OH and 3' PO4; these ends need to be 'repaired' before ligation.

    Fragmentation is inherently touchy. Different sources of RNA can demonstrate radically distinct time and temp requirements. I would recommend performing some pilot tests on your sample types using some basic parameters; vary temp between ~70-95oC, time between ~2-30 min. Use at least ~50 ng of RNA so you can easily see the fragmentation pattern on a bioanalyzer trace.

    One thing to keep in mind about fragmented RNA. There is usually a fairly high molar quantity of 'short' fragments (<50 nt) that can dominate some library prep methods. These small products do not easily show up on gels or bioanalyzer trace since they tend not to stain well with SYBR Gold or Ethidium bromide. If you can afford to lose some material, it is worth doing some sort of RNA clean up after fragmentation. AMPure or SPRI beads are said to work fairly well, but yield can be somewhat low. Typically glass fiber filter methods (ie. Qiagen minelute) sometimes work too well and do not remove enough of the small material.

    I hope this helps.

    Comment


    • #3
      Hi Scooter,

      Thanks, that does help! Just wanted to make sure I'll be able to get a good size distribution with a little optimization.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by scooter View Post
        The ambion fragmentation kit will work fine. It is essentially a buffer containing Zn2+ as the metal ion, among other minor components. The ends of your fragmented RNA will not be compatible for ligation-based library prep methods until you further treat the fragmented RNA with T4 polynucleotide kinase and ATP. Chemical fragmentation results in 5' OH and 3' PO4; these ends need to be 'repaired' before ligation.

        Fragmentation is inherently touchy. Different sources of RNA can demonstrate radically distinct time and temp requirements. I would recommend performing some pilot tests on your sample types using some basic parameters; vary temp between ~70-95oC, time between ~2-30 min. Use at least ~50 ng of RNA so you can easily see the fragmentation pattern on a bioanalyzer trace.

        One thing to keep in mind about fragmented RNA. There is usually a fairly high molar quantity of 'short' fragments (<50 nt) that can dominate some library prep methods. These small products do not easily show up on gels or bioanalyzer trace since they tend not to stain well with SYBR Gold or Ethidium bromide. If you can afford to lose some material, it is worth doing some sort of RNA clean up after fragmentation. AMPure or SPRI beads are said to work fairly well, but yield can be somewhat low. Typically glass fiber filter methods (ie. Qiagen minelute) sometimes work too well and do not remove enough of the small material.

        I hope this helps.
        Hi scooter,
        I saw you are suggesting T4 PNK for RNA repair (5´kinase and 3´phosphatase)after fragmentation.Do you have any idea if the protocol that companies (we have T4PNK from Fermentas) are suggesting for 5´ phosphorilation works well also for 3´phosphatase?
        thanks

        Comment


        • #5
          I think T4 PNK is a much better 5' kinase than 3' phosphatase, but clearly has both activities. After chemical fragmentation the 3' ends are a mixture of 3' PO4, 2' PO4 or 2'-3' cyclic phosphate at some unknown ratio of the three. This would mean that some 3' ends are already compatible for ligation (the ends with 2' PO4 will have a 3' OH) and PNK will then repair the ends with a 3' PO4 (but not the cyclic ends). Thus, even with a somewhat weak phosphatase activity you will still be able to recover a decent proportion of your 3' ends.

          I think most company protocols should work fine. However, I think the phosphatase activity is likely a bit better in the absence of ATP, but of course the kinase activity won't function under these conditions.

          I hope that is helpful.

          Comment


          • #6
            thank you scooter!very helpful, I have to consider this in setting the T4 PNK reaction!

            Comment


            • #7
              Any recommendations on conditions to maximize 5' kinase and 3' phosphatase activity? I was wondering if anyone has found a highly tuned protocol?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by scooter View Post
                I think T4 PNK is a much better 5' kinase than 3' phosphatase, but clearly has both activities. After chemical fragmentation the 3' ends are a mixture of 3' PO4, 2' PO4 or 2'-3' cyclic phosphate at some unknown ratio of the three. This would mean that some 3' ends are already compatible for ligation (the ends with 2' PO4 will have a 3' OH) and PNK will then repair the ends with a 3' PO4 (but not the cyclic ends). Thus, even with a somewhat weak phosphatase activity you will still be able to recover a decent proportion of your 3' ends.

                I think most company protocols should work fine. However, I think the phosphatase activity is likely a bit better in the absence of ATP, but of course the kinase activity won't function under these conditions.

                I hope that is helpful.
                Your post is so informative, thanks for sharing!

                Comment


                • #9
                  We use first-strand buffer from SuperScript II/III to perform the fragmention as this eliminate the need of purification before reverse-transcription.

                  The emergence of NextGen sequencing technology has generated much interest in the exploration of transcriptomes. Currently, Illumina Inc. (San Diego, CA) provides one of the most widely utilized sequencing platforms for gene expression analysis. While Illumina reagents and protocols perform adequately in RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), alternative reagents and protocols promise a higher throughput at a much lower cost. We have developed a low-cost and robust protocol to produce Illumina-compatible (GAIIx and HiSeq2000 platforms) RNA-seq libraries by combining several recent improvements. First, we designed balanced adapter sequences for multiplexing of samples; second, dUTP incorporation in 2nd strand synthesis was used to enforce strand-specificity; third, we simplified RNA purification, fragmentation and library size-selection steps thus drastically reducing the time and increasing throughput of library construction; fourth, we included an RNA spike-in control for validation and normalization purposes. To streamline informatics analysis for the community, we established a pipeline within the iPlant Collaborative. These scripts are easily customized to meet specific research needs and improve on existing informatics and statistical treatments of RNA-seq data. In particular, we apply significance tests for determining differential gene expression and intron retention events. To demonstrate the potential of both the library-construction protocol and data-analysis pipeline, we characterized the transcriptome of the rice leaf. Our data supports novel gene models and can be used to improve current rice genome annotation. Additionally, using the rice transcriptome data, we compared different methods of calculating gene expression and discuss the advantages of a strand-specific approach to detect bona-fide anti-sense transcripts and to detect intron retention events. Our results demonstrate the potential of this low cost and robust method for RNA-seq library construction and data analysis.


                  Our paper described what the profile of sheared RNA molecules... the smaller fragments (e.g <100) can be effectively removed using SPRI purification.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Hello all,

                    Can anyone tell me why in some protocols (Directional mRNA-seq) one has to treat with a phosphatase (that removes de 5' phosphate) and then with T4 PNK after RNA fragmentation? I mean, it seems to me that treatment with T4 PNK would be enough to repair the 5'OH and the 3'P ends, so what is the point of treating with a phosphatase?

                    Sorry if the question is too obvious.

                    Thanks in advance!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by amazonic9 View Post
                      Hello all,

                      Can anyone tell me why in some protocols (Directional mRNA-seq) one has to treat with a phosphatase (that removes de 5' phosphate) and then with T4 PNK after RNA fragmentation? I mean, it seems to me that treatment with T4 PNK would be enough to repair the 5'OH and the 3'P ends, so what is the point of treating with a phosphatase?

                      Sorry if the question is too obvious.

                      Thanks in advance!
                      I think some protocols ligate a single-stranded 3' adapter to the RNA first using T4 RNA ligase 2, then T4 PNK and then ligate the 5' adapter? If so, then the reason is that they don't want the 3' adapter ligating to the 5' end of the RNA. So they dephosphorylate it. They could make the 3' adapter 3'-dideoxy instead, I guess. But maybe they do both.

                      --
                      Phillip

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Thank you phillip for the answer. That makes sense to me. But in the particular case that I am using this phosphatase + PNK treatment, do not ligate a 3' adapter before the treatment with PNK. The workflow is: fragmentation of RNA, treatment with phosphatase, treatment with PNK, and then ligation of the 3' and 5' adapters. So I still do not understand what is the sense of using that phosphatase step...

                        Any other idea?

                        Thank you!

                        amazonic9

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          The lore is that T4 PNK's 3' phosphatase activity is "weak". I think heat + divalent cation based fragmentation methods yield 5' hydroxyl/3' phosphate and this must be reversed for T4 ligases to work. So it seems likely to me that your protocol decided to err on the side of caution in removing the 3' phosphates.

                          --
                          Phillip

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I had the same question as amazonic9 since I also came across the same protocol. Thanks so much Phillip for your helpful post.
                            Antartic phosphatase will remove the 5'P along with 3'P, Right? and then PNK will add 5'P and also remove 3'P. Instead if we just carry out PNK treatment ( more units than usual) i in absence of ATP, will it not have the same effect?
                            Thanks
                            J

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              In principle, yes. But I have never attempted it myself, so be forewarned. Lots of things that work in principle fail to work in practice. But if it is bugging you, it would be worth an attempt.

                              Alternatively you dig up a paper on T4 PNK activities. Sometimes the issue is that one activity works under one set of conditions while another is optimum under a different set.

                              Oh, one more issue. From what I read in the past the major product of heat/divalent cation RNA fragmentation are fragments with a 3'-2' cyclic phosphate group. Could be this hydrolyzes at a high rate into either a plain 3' phosphate or a 2' phosphate. Or not. Can T4PNK remove a cyclic phosphate? Can Shrimp Alkaline Phosphatase remove a cyclic phosphate? I don't know.

                              The problem with altering a protocol that is working is that you venture off the "path" that someone else has blazed for you. It might be a poor path, but if you have gotten it to work in the past, you have evidence that it will get you where you need to go. Venture off the path and you are more or less on your own...

                              --
                              Phillip

                              Comment

                              Latest Articles

                              Collapse

                              • seqadmin
                                Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
                                by seqadmin


                                Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
                                03-22-2024, 06:39 AM
                              • seqadmin
                                Techniques and Challenges in Conservation Genomics
                                by seqadmin



                                The field of conservation genomics centers on applying genomics technologies in support of conservation efforts and the preservation of biodiversity. This article features interviews with two researchers who showcase their innovative work and highlight the current state and future of conservation genomics.

                                Avian Conservation
                                Matthew DeSaix, a recent doctoral graduate from Kristen Ruegg’s lab at The University of Colorado, shared that most of his research...
                                03-08-2024, 10:41 AM

                              ad_right_rmr

                              Collapse

                              News

                              Collapse

                              Topics Statistics Last Post
                              Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 06:37 PM
                              0 responses
                              11 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post seqadmin  
                              Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 06:07 PM
                              0 responses
                              10 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post seqadmin  
                              Started by seqadmin, 03-22-2024, 10:03 AM
                              0 responses
                              51 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post seqadmin  
                              Started by seqadmin, 03-21-2024, 07:32 AM
                              0 responses
                              68 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post seqadmin  
                              Working...
                              X