![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
samtools pileup | BioSlayer | Bioinformatics | 9 | 01-16-2012 04:10 AM |
samtools pileup | raghu1990 | Bioinformatics | 0 | 06-28-2011 03:26 AM |
samtools pileup | wisosonic | Bioinformatics | 0 | 05-11-2011 05:57 AM |
Tophat v1.1.4 bug - cannot handle non-numeric versions of Samtools | adumitri | Bioinformatics | 4 | 01-10-2011 06:18 AM |
samtools pileup format | foxyg | Bioinformatics | 3 | 11-16-2010 08:25 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: India Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2
|
![]()
Hello,
** I have used pileup function with -vcf options both with samtools versions 0.1.7a and 0.1.12a ** I found the pileup output from both versions of samtools to be very different. ** Using the same aligner with exact same options, samtools 0.1.7a is giving me 452 unique SNVs and the version 0.1.12a 251 unique SNVs. ** There are 196 SNVs that are common to both versions of samtools. This is after I use varfilter with default parameters with SNP quality cutoff of 20. ** I understand that the old version of samtools use the MAQ SNP calling criteria and we have not used -A option with samtools version 0.1.12a, hence have not forced MAQ calling criteria. *** I am confused with the data and would like to understand why there is such difference in results between the two versions of samtools. Can any one help in this regard ? Thank you Pooja |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: 41°17'49"N / 2°4'42"E Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 323
|
![]()
The snp caller engine has changed dramatically among those versions. Review carefully the manuals, particularly mpileup.
That being said. The overlapping events sounds a little bit low but it depends on the coverage for your project.
__________________
-drd |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Location: San Diego Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 912
|
![]()
Using the -B option on the new pileup command might cause it to behave more like the old pileup.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Location: 41°17'49"N / 2°4'42"E Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 323
|
![]()
If I am not mistaken the latest version uses the SOAP model instead of the MAQ model at the core of the snp caller. Let us know if by removing BAQ computations (-B) you get similar results to the old version.
__________________
-drd |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|