Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MiSeq runs failed "focus out of spec"

    I'd like to take an informal poll. How many of you that routinely run a MiSeq have had multiple runs fail because focus is out of spec or Z-axis out of spec. I took over running a MiSeq in Jan, since then I've had 9 runs fail because of focusing issues, most times 200+ cycles into the run.

    We typically run 500 cycle kits and have had this issue on both high (genomes) and low (amplicon) complexity samples. Yes Illumina replaces the kit and dispatches a tech but every time we loose a week of machine time. I've talked to a couple of people IRL who have MiSeq and neither have ever had a run fail because of focus. Several times it's seemed that "the" cause of the issue was found-cables rubbing on the stage, etc. But the failures keep happening.
    Microbial ecologist, running a sequencing core. I have lots of strong opinions on how to survey communities, pretty sure some are even correct.

  • #2
    We've probably done fifteen runs since getting our MiSeq and two have failed because of focus issues during cycle 1. Tech support tells us that it's because of either underclustering or overclustering of the cell, but without an image taken we cannot prove which, if either. I am skeptical that clustering problems are the cause, since both times this has happened we simply loaded a new flow cell with no changes and the run worked fine. Illumina replaced the kits but, as you mentioned, we lose time.

    Generally, I'm not too impressed with the MiSeq. They're big on marketing the 300-bp read length, but I've found that the quality drops off quite dramatically after about 250-260 bp, such that our read merging starts to tank. They say they're working on improving this, but that doesn't help me right now. Improvements could be released tomorrow, or never.

    Comment


    • #3
      Hi - never had the "out of spec" error after ~100 miseq runs. As cheezemeister mentioned the only time we have had focus issues is due to under clustering - when we were dialing-in our quant. We also had a couple of runs 'stop' if they tip off the end of the amplicon (this also causes a focus issue) - the solution here is not to include cycles that you don't really need.

      Comment


      • #4
        @thermophile: In addition to the clustering issues mentioned above, bad libraries can also result in the instrument not finding focus. Out of curiosity were you able to successfully sequence a library that had encountered this error on a subsequent run without any changes?

        Comment


        • #5
          All of our focusing issues are well into the run, which doesn't make sense. The majority have failed in R2. Looking at the thumbnails, the tiles seem pretty well focused then suddenly they'll stop. All of the failed libraries have eventually being successfully run though some have taken a few tries.

          cheezemeister-The few times we've tried v3 600 cycle kits, we saw more dramatic drop in q score after ~200 & 400 cycles than what we see on v2 500. So it's not like the q score drop in the 600 kits is just a continuation of what you see in 500 cycle kits, it's actually worse.
          Microbial ecologist, running a sequencing core. I have lots of strong opinions on how to survey communities, pretty sure some are even correct.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by thermophile View Post
            All of our focusing issues are well into the run, which doesn't make sense. The majority have failed in R2. Looking at the thumbnails, the tiles seem pretty well focused then suddenly they'll stop. All of the failed libraries have eventually being successfully run though some have taken a few tries.
            Did that involve changing loading concentration/adding a phiX spike. I am wondering if there is a problem with your specific instrument. Generally getting your FAS involved will help move the case in the right direction.

            cheezemeister-The few times we've tried v3 600 cycle kits, we saw more dramatic drop in q score after ~200 & 400 cycles than what we see on v2 500. So it's not like the q score drop in the 600 kits is just a continuation of what you see in 500 cycle kits, it's actually worse.
            This is a known issue with 600 cycle kits. Here is the thread: http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=59558

            Comment


            • #7
              Geno, I really think there is something wrong with our specific instrument. our FAS and FAE have been here so much that I feel like we're old buddies. Old buddies who only see each other when we're annoyed with each other. My FAS has said that our focus issues seem to happen a little more often than most other instruments but that's as far as he's been willing to go. Hence my polling the interwebs to see if we really are experiences somehting unusual.

              Sometimes we do increase the phix or add another genome to the reruns but not always.

              eta, we always run at least 1% phix, up to 20% if we have no genomes to increase complexity of amplicon runs
              Last edited by thermophile; 09-23-2015, 09:27 AM.
              Microbial ecologist, running a sequencing core. I have lots of strong opinions on how to survey communities, pretty sure some are even correct.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • seqadmin
                Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
                by seqadmin


                Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
                03-22-2024, 06:39 AM
              • seqadmin
                Techniques and Challenges in Conservation Genomics
                by seqadmin



                The field of conservation genomics centers on applying genomics technologies in support of conservation efforts and the preservation of biodiversity. This article features interviews with two researchers who showcase their innovative work and highlight the current state and future of conservation genomics.

                Avian Conservation
                Matthew DeSaix, a recent doctoral graduate from Kristen Ruegg’s lab at The University of Colorado, shared that most of his research...
                03-08-2024, 10:41 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 06:37 PM
              0 responses
              11 views
              0 likes
              Last Post seqadmin  
              Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 06:07 PM
              0 responses
              10 views
              0 likes
              Last Post seqadmin  
              Started by seqadmin, 03-22-2024, 10:03 AM
              0 responses
              51 views
              0 likes
              Last Post seqadmin  
              Started by seqadmin, 03-21-2024, 07:32 AM
              0 responses
              68 views
              0 likes
              Last Post seqadmin  
              Working...
              X