![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
loss of library DNA in the last purification, need help | Anjani | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 3 | 06-27-2014 12:52 AM |
Library prep with <100ng DNA? | sstarkenburg | Illumina/Solexa | 20 | 03-05-2013 05:25 AM |
Can Truseq DNA library get >1ug DNA library at last? | rnal | Illumina/Solexa | 2 | 04-12-2012 08:36 AM |
how much DNA is required for library preparation? | chromatin | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 0 | 11-14-2010 07:46 PM |
Library prep using chromosome sorted DNA | Scotch | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 0 | 08-14-2010 05:44 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: cambridge Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9
|
![]()
Hi...I make DNA libraries using PE protocol. I modified it a little bit.i do 4 PCR reactions, pool the PCR product and run down the gel again to get rid of any dimers formed.I've started to see a hump fused with my library peak on bioanalyzer, unable to figure out what's causing these humps. I have attached the bioanalyer traces showing a good and a bad library.Please let me know if anybody has seen this problem before and have figured out what's causing these bumps.
Thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Location: Germany Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 33
|
![]()
Hi mollusc, I would assume that the second (right) pic shows an overloaded well. Does it get better if you dilute the sample (1:20 of example)? If you pool the PCR-products and purify then, the conc. should be higher, right - or did you already dilute?
Besides, the hump you see behind the upper marker in both traces is likely ssDNA - biut I guess that one didn't bother you :-) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Location: cambridge Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9
|
![]()
Hi Susanne,
Thanks for your reply.initially even i thought overloading could be the reason,but then i perfored series of experiments diluting the library and it did give humps again.i just don't have any idea how ssDNA would run on bioanalyzer |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Location: Germany Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 33
|
![]()
Hi, in order not to confuse anything: you are referring to the peak that is larger than 500 bp, the one right behind the large library peak that is disturbing to you, right? And this one didn't go away when diluting the sample?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Location: cambridge Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9
|
![]()
No, sorry.I'm talking talking about 300bp aterial which i fused with my 400bp library
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Junior Member
Location: Chile Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 8
|
![]()
mollusc, I have the same problem! There's a hump (median size) fused with my ~400bp library gDNA. I only have this issue with gDNA libraries, not with RNA. I use TruSeq RNA Sample prep kit with both (gDNA sonicated by Covaris previously). It doesn't seem like adapter dimers, since they appear at ~150bp. I really can't figure out what's this strange peak/hump that doesn't align with the reference genome at all. Please, if someone have any ideas, I'd be (very) grateful
![]()
__________________
Science is ok, but I'm hungry. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Location: Germany Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 33
|
![]()
Could you share an electropherogram image of the issue, please?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|