Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Number of PCR How many PCR cycles to enrich adapter-modified DNA fragments

    We are prepping our samples for exome sequencing (Agilent Sureselect followed by 100bp PE version 4 chemistry). The Illumina library preparation protocol includes a PCR step to enrich the adapter-modified fragments. The protocol asks for 1ul of DNA to be added and for 18 cycles of PCR. This seems a lot, especially as we are getting a lot of duplicate reads/PCR artifact in our data.

    Has anyone tried a lower number of cycles, and, if so, how did it work out for you?
    Best
    MGH Man

    (Sorry if this issue has been posted before )

  • #2
    The Agilent Exome seqcap protocol calls for 6 cycles of PCR to enrich for adapter modified fragments. I haven't tried it yet but I'm sure it will work.

    Comment


    • #3
      I've done a handful of Agilent's exome sample prep and yes the 6 cycles for the initial prep is plenty. I would recommend starting with as close to 3ug as possible as when I've started with lower amounts of DNA ( around 2ug) it is more difficult to achieve the requisite 500ng to continue with the capture steps.

      Comment


      • #4
        Could you further reduce the pre-hyb PCR cycle number, e.g to 3 rounds of PCR using PE primers?

        I suppose theoretically 3 rounds is the minimum, since you need the symmetric PCR product mentioned in the diagram of greigite in thread:

        Bridged amplification & clustering followed by sequencing by synthesis. (Genome Analyzer / HiSeq / MiSeq)

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by JUdw View Post
          Could you further reduce the pre-hyb PCR cycle number, e.g to 3 rounds of PCR using PE primers?

          I suppose theoretically 3 rounds is the minimum, since you need the symmetric PCR product mentioned in the diagram of greigite in thread:

          http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthr...?t=198&&page=2
          I have tried going down to 4 cycles with the standard PE library prep protocol but could not see anything on bioanalyzer. However, my guess is that I did not have enough template DNA in the reaction. Really you are only limited by how sensitive your library quantification method is- qPCR is probably the most sensitive.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by greigite View Post
            I have tried going down to 4 cycles with the standard PE library prep protocol but could not see anything on bioanalyzer. However, my guess is that I did not have enough template DNA in the reaction. Really you are only limited by how sensitive your library quantification method is- qPCR is probably the most sensitive.
            I already have about 500ng of template, so i think I don't really need to do the pre-hyb PCR. For qPCR the pre-hyb PCR is however required, since these primers only anneal to the extended PCR product. Therefore i don't want to skip the pre-PCR, but i really want to use as few cycles as possible.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • seqadmin
              Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
              by seqadmin


              The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist on Modified Bases...
              Yesterday, 07:01 AM
            • seqadmin
              Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
              by seqadmin


              Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
              04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
            0 responses
            37 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
            0 responses
            41 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
            0 responses
            35 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
            0 responses
            55 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Working...
            X