Tweet
When my Pacbio sequencing was done I ended up with 18 subreads that each contained xxxx number of sequences (6,431,149 sequences in total for all 18 subreads). Due to particular reasons of having an allocation at a super computer I was having troubles running the Canu command that encompasses all three stages: correct, trim, assemble. So what I decided to do was individually execute the Canu-correct command on each of the 18 subreads. So now I have a list of 18 subreads that have been corrected. My questions is would there be a difference if I would have executed the Canu-correct command on one single file that was a concatenation of all 18 subreads? I ask because I am going to do some downstream analysis with the corrected reads and want to make sure that I am doing this right. Thank you!
-
The sequencing world is rapidly changing due to declining costs, enhanced accuracies, and the advent of newer, cutting-edge instruments. Equally important to these developments are improvements in sequencing analysis, a process that converts vast amounts of raw data into a comprehensible and meaningful form. This complex task requires expertise and the right analysis tools. In this article, we highlight the progress and innovation in sequencing analysis by reviewing several of the...Today, 07:48 AM -
The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist...04-22-2024, 07:01 AM
Comment