SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Applications Forums > RNA Sequencing



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RNA-seq technical replicates at library construction level obig Bioinformatics 9 08-15-2012 11:43 PM
DESeq: question about with replicates and without any replicates. nb509 RNA Sequencing 2 10-25-2011 06:04 AM
technical replicates uncorrelate with each other tujchl Epigenetics 4 05-26-2011 06:16 PM
Source of A runs at end of read? terencetate Illumina/Solexa 0 11-01-2010 07:08 AM
Read quality filtering for long, PE runs kmcarr Illumina/Solexa 0 07-21-2009 07:07 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-30-2012, 09:40 AM   #1
scottdaniel
Junior Member
 
Location: Tucson, AZ

Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 9
Question Read runs and technical replicates

So I've downloaded some example data from SRA archives at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra?term=SRA011001 and had a question about technical and biological replicates (see attached picture for a snapshot of the downloads). I know that there are two biological replicates for control and treatment conditions (in this case a miR155 over-expression retrovirus) but I'm not sure about the technical replicates.

Do read runs count as technical replicates?

And, if so, how can I use that in my analysis pipeline (currently I'm using the Tuxedo suite (i.e. tophat > cufflinks > cuffmerge, etc.)).

Right now I think I'm just telling the program that there are six biological replicates of each condition (i.e. 6 x miR155oe vs. 6 x control) which is probably wrong.

Thanks, Scott
Attached Images
File Type: png sra reads of b-cell lines.png (85.9 KB, 16 views)
scottdaniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 10:38 AM   #2
chadn737
Senior Member
 
Location: US

Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 392
Default

It has been shown in many cases that Biological variation is far greater than technical variation in Illumina sequencing and typically individual runs are pooled together and treated as one sample. Ideally thats why you multiplex all your biological replicates and spread the sequencing across multiple lanes.
chadn737 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 11:12 AM   #3
scottdaniel
Junior Member
 
Location: Tucson, AZ

Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chadn737 View Post
It has been shown in many cases that Biological variation is far greater than technical variation in Illumina sequencing and typically individual runs are pooled together and treated as one sample. Ideally thats why you multiplex all your biological replicates and spread the sequencing across multiple lanes.
Is there paper where this is shown?

So perhaps I should merge my .sam files per biological replicate and then do the tophat/bowtie alignment?

Thanks.
scottdaniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 11:49 AM   #4
chadn737
Senior Member
 
Location: US

Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 392
Default

Marioni, J. C., C. E. Mason, S. M. Mane, M. Stephens and Y. Gilad,
2008 RNA-Seq: an assessment of technical reproducibility and
comparison with gene expression arrays. Genome Res. 18: 15091517.
chadn737 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO