Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Futility of Defining Sequencing "Generations"

    I just recently answered a question on Quora about the number of “sequencing generations” there are. (My answer was basically that the concept of generations for sequencing has never been used consistently, doesn’t make much sense and isn’t very helpful.) In doing so I quickly categorized the various technologies based on a number of attributes:

    1) sequencing-by-synthesis vs direct sequencing (vs ligation vs hybridization)
    2) stepped vs continuous sequencing
    3) optical vs non-optical detection
    4) short vs long reads
    5) single molecule vs amplified

    And here’s how I mapped the major platforms to these categories:

    Illumina = SBS, stepped, optical, short read, amplified
    Ion = SBS, continuous, non-optical, short read, amplified
    PacBio = SBS, continuous, optical, long read, single molecule
    Oxford Nanopore = direct, continuous, non-optical, long read, single molecule
    Helicos/SeqLL = SBS, stepped, optical, short read, single molecule
    454 = SBS, continuous, optical, short*, amplified (* considered ‘long reads’ at the time, but now at least an order of magnitude shorter than the long read technologies)
    SOLiD = ligation, stepped, optical, short read, amplified

    I’d be curious to hear what others think. The least satisfying is the “stepped vs continuous” category. ONT doesn’t fit perfectly cleanly as they could be considered “stepped” since a ratcheting protein is used, but it doesn’t have the distinct cycles of Illumina’s SBS chemistry. Also, I wasn’t 100% sure about the Helicos technology – is it cycle driven or continuous like Ion? Thoughts?
    AllSeq - The Sequencing Marketplace
    [email protected]
    www.AllSeq.com

  • #2
    Helicos is one base then image, like Illumina.

    I think nanopores are continuous. I don't see much of a difference between a polymerase adding nucs and a template being moved through a pore by enzymatic action. Certainly the timescales involved group Oxford Nanopore with other continuous platforms.

    Nice way to organize them, though!
    Providing nextRAD genotyping and PacBio sequencing services. http://snpsaurus.com

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by SNPsaurus View Post
      I don't see much of a difference between a polymerase adding nucs and a template being moved through a pore by enzymatic action.
      That's a really good point!
      AllSeq - The Sequencing Marketplace
      [email protected]
      www.AllSeq.com

      Comment


      • #4
        You missed out sanger sequencing (e.g. ABI 3730), which doesn't really fit into the nice bins you've created. My best guess:

        SBS, stepped, optical, long, amplified

        Are there any electrical (or non-optical) sanger sequencers around? Would radiosequencing count?

        Comment


        • #5
          You should consider a "time to sequence" component.

          We went from day(s) (if you include sub-cloning needed etc) in case of Sanger (first radio-labled then ABI) to less than a week (454, initial Illumina) to back to days (2000,2500), <24h (PacBio per SMRTcell, Ion per chip, not counting prep) and back down to a couple of hours (nanopore).
          Last edited by GenoMax; 01-15-2017, 05:49 AM.

          Comment


          • #6
            For pure detection only, nanopore can give you a diagnostic indication within a couple of minutes (assuming a great flow cell, great sample prep, and high proportion of target genome in the sample) -- It doesn't really make sense declaring a particular length of time for sequencing. Maybe 'interruptible' would be better.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by gringer View Post
              You missed out sanger sequencing (e.g. ABI 3730), which doesn't really fit into the nice bins you've created. My best guess:

              SBS, stepped, optical, long, amplified

              Are there any electrical (or non-optical) sanger sequencers around? Would radiosequencing count?
              I specifically avoided Sanger sequencing, partly out of laziness and partly because people usually refer to 'generations' in 'next generation' sequencing. That said, I would agree with your assessment apart from 'long' - PacBio and ONT have really redefined what 'long reads' mean! Also, I think radiosequencing would still count as 'optical' as film is used as the detection method.
              AllSeq - The Sequencing Marketplace
              [email protected]
              www.AllSeq.com

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
                You should consider a "time to sequence" component.

                We went from day(s) (if you include sub-cloning needed etc) in case of Sanger (first radio-labled then ABI) to less than a week (454, initial Illumina) to back to days (2000,2500), <24h (PacBio per SMRTcell, Ion per chip, not counting prep) and back down to a couple of hours (nanopore).
                Adding "time to sequence" is an interesting idea, but it seems complicated. I was keeping the list at a pretty high level - e.g., Illumina vs PacBio. The time to sequence would vary depending on a specific platform (e.g, MiSeq vs HiSeq X) and would vary from application to application. But it is definitely an important variable.
                AllSeq - The Sequencing Marketplace
                [email protected]
                www.AllSeq.com

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • seqadmin
                  Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
                  by seqadmin


                  Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
                  03-22-2024, 06:39 AM
                • seqadmin
                  Techniques and Challenges in Conservation Genomics
                  by seqadmin



                  The field of conservation genomics centers on applying genomics technologies in support of conservation efforts and the preservation of biodiversity. This article features interviews with two researchers who showcase their innovative work and highlight the current state and future of conservation genomics.

                  Avian Conservation
                  Matthew DeSaix, a recent doctoral graduate from Kristen Ruegg’s lab at The University of Colorado, shared that most of his research...
                  03-08-2024, 10:41 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 06:37 PM
                0 responses
                11 views
                0 likes
                Last Post seqadmin  
                Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 06:07 PM
                0 responses
                10 views
                0 likes
                Last Post seqadmin  
                Started by seqadmin, 03-22-2024, 10:03 AM
                0 responses
                51 views
                0 likes
                Last Post seqadmin  
                Started by seqadmin, 03-21-2024, 07:32 AM
                0 responses
                67 views
                0 likes
                Last Post seqadmin  
                Working...
                X