![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fasta consensus, SNP call and FreeBayes | hugorody | Bioinformatics | 0 | 05-28-2013 03:02 PM |
VarScan2 somatic output (genotype call) | desmo | Bioinformatics | 1 | 12-27-2012 08:49 AM |
VCF output from FreeBayes | cigsit | Bioinformatics | 4 | 12-20-2012 01:44 AM |
Incorrect Genotype information in VCF | Karen Chait Berman | Bioinformatics | 0 | 08-20-2012 06:40 AM |
genotype likelihood inconsist with genotype field in mpileup output | plantae | Bioinformatics | 0 | 03-26-2012 09:10 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 | |
Junior Member
Location: Davis, CA Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10
|
![]()
So I ran freebayes 1.3.1 with all the default parameters on dog dna samples. I am getting this result for one of the samples (although it seems to be occurring in other samples too):
Quote:
![]() This implies that most of the reads should go to the 1/1 genotype call. And, the AD field looks like this: 0,22,0,0,0,0,0 There are 22 reads that contribute to the 1st alt allele and none to the others. So shouldn't the call be 1/1? Last edited by najoshi; 07-08-2020 at 04:15 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Location: Ukraine Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 3
|
![]()
I cant understand the difference between genotype and phenotype in this case. Found only this review https://differencebtwn.com/differenc...e-vs-phenotype
Last edited by kimaline; 11-29-2020 at 09:06 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
freebayes, genotype, vcf |
Thread Tools | |
|
|