Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • RNA-Seq Time series analysis in EdgeR

    Hello,

    I have an RNA-Seq experiment from insect antennae across different data points (0,2,4,6 and 8 days) with 7 replicates per data point (except t6 with 6 replicates). I am analysing using EdgeR to identify differentially expressed genes. I have used the following EdgeR script in my analysis:
    1) I created the DGEList object, data normalization and created the design matrix of my experiment

    Code:
    samples_matrix
    group <- factor(c('t0','t0','t0','t0','t0','t0','t0','t2','t2','t2','t2','t2','t2','t2','t4','t4','t4','t4','t4','t4','t4','t6','t6','t6','t6','t6','t6','t8','t8','t8','t8','t8','t8','t8'))
    y <- DGEList(counts=samples_matrix, group=group)
    y <- calcNormFactors(y)
    design <- model.matrix(~0+group, data=y$samples)
    colnames(design) <- levels(y$samples$group)
    The design matrix is composed by 1 and 0 and it has a total of 5 columns (with the different time points) and 34 rows with the samples.

    2) I estimated the dispersion and fitted to Quasilikehood ratio F model
    Code:
    y <- estimateDisp(y,design)
    fit <- glmQLFit(y,design, robust=TRUE)
    3) I defined my contrast. We performed those contrasts that are consecutives (my.constrats1) and all possible combinations (my.contrast2).

    Code:
    my.contrasts1 <- makeContrasts(t2vst0=t2-t0, t4vst2=t4-t2, t6vst4=t6-t4, t8vst6=t8-t6, levels=design)
    my.contrasts2 <- makeContrasts(t2vst0=t2-t0, t4vst0=t4-t0, t6vst0=t6-t0, t8vst0=t8-t0, t4vst2=t4-t2, t6vst2=t6-t2, t8vst2=t8-t2, t6vst4=t6-t4, t8vst4=t8-t4, t8vst6=t8-t6, levels=design)
    4) I performed the QLMFtest, filtered using HTSfilter package (script not included in this post) and corrections for both approaches. After that, I performed pairwise comparisons between the different contrasts defined in the point 3 (I did not include this part of the analysis in the post).

    Code:
    res1 <- glmQLFTest(fit, contrast=my.contrasts1)
    res_est1 <- topTags(res1, n=Inf,  adjust.method="BH", sort.by="PValue")
    res2 <- glmQLFTest(fit, contrast=my.contrasts2)
    res_est2 <- topTags(res2, n=Inf,  adjust.method="BH", sort.by="PValue")
    Both res_est objects contains logFc comparisons for the specified contrasts and the corresponding logCPM, F, PValue and FDR values. However, I have some doubts:

    The information in both "rest_est" objects was "Coefficient: LR test on 4 degrees of freedom", however, the number of comparisons were 4 and 10 and then the degrees of freedom has to be different.
    When I check rest_est tables, observed that logCPM, F, PValue and FDR values are the same in both approaches and then the differentially expressed genes obtained using decideTestsDGE was also the same (5066 not sig and 6120 were sig).

    I do not know if I have something wrong in my script or I missed some step in my analysis. Besides, I would like to know which approach would be more correct, because including all the possible time comparisons increases the number of comparisons and it will affect the statistical analysis (more corrections will be necessary) and maybe I lost some genes with small changes.

    Thanks a lot for your help

    Jose

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
    by seqadmin




    The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist...
    04-22-2024, 07:01 AM
  • seqadmin
    Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
    by seqadmin


    Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
    04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 08:47 AM
0 responses
14 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
0 responses
60 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
0 responses
60 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
0 responses
54 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X