Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Best Library kit for illumina low amount RNA

    Hi all,
    we are interested in doing RNA-seq (for differential gene expression analysis) on total RNA samples. Our sequencer is illumina HiSeq 2500.
    We have approximately 20-50ng of RNA per sample.
    I have found the following kits for library preparation:

    1. Takara/Clontech
    SMARTer Stranded RNA-Seq Kits—Strand-Specific Library Construction for Transcriptome Analysis on Illumina Platforms
    needs 100 pico to 100 ng

    2. TruSeq kits seem to need a min 100 ng.(right?)

    3. NEBNext Ultra RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina
    Total RNA:
    10 ng – 1 μg

    4. Epicentre
    ScriptSeq™ v2 RNA-Seq Library Preparation Kit
    0.5ng-50 ng

    5. Nugene Ovation® RNA-Seq System V2
    min 0.5ng RNA


    We heard NEBNext is good, and we have used Nugene(worked ok)

    In your experience, which is the best for gene expression analysis?

    Many thanks!
    3
    Takara/Clontech SMARTer Stranded RNA-Seq Kits
    33.33%
    1
    TruSeq
    33.33%
    1
    NEBNext Ultra RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina
    33.33%
    1
    Epicentre ScriptSeq™ v2 RNA-Seq Library Preparation Kit
    0.00%
    0
    Nugene Ovation® RNA-Seq System V2
    0.00%
    0

    The poll is expired.


  • #2
    Need a little more information to make a clear recommendation

    Hi ildem,

    Before we help you decide which kit is best, it would be nice to know more about the quality of the RNA you will be using in this study. Is it high quality RNA from fresh samples? Or is it degraded, or even from FFPE samples?

    Also when you say you want to do "RNA-Seq on total RNA" samples do you mean Total RNA-Seq (using RiboZero) or just that you want to start with Total RNA and do a polyA capture based mRNA prep?

    Are you interested in mostly coding mRNA or do you also want to look at non-coding RNAs, many of which may not have a polyA tail?

    Regardless of these answers 20 to 50 ng of total RNA is not really that low these days. Many researchers successfully use the TruSeq kits from Illumina at these levels, even though they are spec'd out for 100 ng.

    If you have good RNA (RIN of >8), and want to study differential gene expression levels, then I would try the TruSeq Stranded mRNA Sample Prep Kit from Illumina.

    Good Luck!

    Sincerely,

    RNA

    Comment


    • #3
      Dear RNA,
      Thank you very much!

      We have good RINs (9-10) just not much of the RNA and its quite precious.
      Would you then use the true-seq kits?

      If we were to have lower amounts, say5-10 ng, with good RINs, which would you then recommend?

      many thanks!
      i

      Comment


      • #4
        Dear RNA,
        Thank you very much!

        We have good RINs (9-10) just not much of the RNA and its quite precious.
        Would you then use the true-seq kits?

        If we were to have lower amounts, say5-10 ng, with good RINs, which would you then recommend?

        many thanks!
        i

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • seqadmin
          Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
          by seqadmin


          The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist on Modified Bases...
          Yesterday, 07:01 AM
        • seqadmin
          Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
          by seqadmin


          Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
          04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
        0 responses
        39 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
        0 responses
        41 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
        0 responses
        35 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
        0 responses
        55 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Working...
        X