SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Applications Forums > Sample Prep / Library Generation



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pre-Capture Pooling with Nimblegen SeqCap EZ v3: SNP detection quality? EvilTwin Genomic Resequencing 9 07-06-2012 04:05 AM
V3 NimbleGen exome kit sehrrot Sample Prep / Library Generation 1 02-22-2012 04:15 AM
Exome Sequencing with NimbleGen SeqCap EZ v2 Ulli Genomic Resequencing 4 04-25-2011 05:21 PM
Nimblegen officially describes "SeqCap" genome decomplexing service ECO 454 Pyrosequencing 2 10-08-2008 11:41 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-26-2012, 11:55 PM   #1
airtime
Member
 
Location: Germany

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 14
Default Exome Sequencing with nimblegen SeqCap EZ v3

Hi,

we working with a GAllx from Illumina and have good experience with nimblegen SeqCap EZ v2 (on target).
We compare the nimblegen SeqCap EZ v3 and Illumina TrueSeq exome kits and the results shocked me .
For nimblegen we have nice mapping rate and low duplication level, but on target it is only 30 %.
For illumina mapping is well but duplicate level is high (20 - 30 %). On target we can reach 76 %.

How it could be that the on target of nimblen v3 kit is so bad? We have good results in the pre steps and everything looks similar to nimblegen v2.

About hints or sharing experience about the nimblegen v3 kit I would be very lucky.
airtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2012, 11:36 AM   #2
josdegraaf
Member
 
Location: Germany

Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 33
Default

What do you call on target?
josdegraaf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 10:28 PM   #3
airtime
Member
 
Location: Germany

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 14
Default

Hi,

there are design files (.bed) with region information. And that reads mapped to the genome, including a region from the design file too, are on target.
airtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 11:00 PM   #4
josdegraaf
Member
 
Location: Germany

Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 33
Default

I know but some people take +- 100 or 200 bases as on target and some don't. Anyway 30% is very low, should be more towards >95% bases covered. We also used V3 and had +- 98%. Illumina performs slightly less with +- 92%.
How deep did you sequence?
josdegraaf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012, 12:45 AM   #5
airtime
Member
 
Location: Germany

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 14
Default

Hi,

we used this desing file "SeqCap_EZ_Exome_v3_capture.bed" it include +- 100bp.
how deep means how many reads we get out or how many mapped?
airtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2012, 03:39 AM   #6
airtime
Member
 
Location: Germany

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 14
Default

Hi,

what you mentioned that 95% of bases are called means the uniformity.
But the issue is that we mapped >90% of 100 000 000 reads to the genome and then we calculate the 30% on target amount (after duplication removement).
airtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO