SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Applications Forums > Sample Prep / Library Generation



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Genomic DNA libraries using Nextera creeves Illumina/Solexa 3 03-02-2013 11:03 AM
Service provider for Illuminas Nextera libraries steinmann Illumina/Solexa 1 06-07-2012 03:57 AM
qPCR to validate/quantify Nextera library mikmz Sample Prep / Library Generation 0 12-14-2011 12:26 AM
qPCR - concentration vs cluster density for different libraries ScottC Sample Prep / Library Generation 0 03-17-2011 04:58 PM
Discrepancies between PicoGreen and qPCR in GA libraries fedora Sample Prep / Library Generation 3 08-25-2009 05:52 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-27-2012, 04:52 PM   #1
kcchan
Senior Member
 
Location: USA

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 184
Default qPCR on Nextera XT Libraries

Has anyone had any luck trying to quantify Nextera XT libraries using qPCR? I have tried it twice with no success. I have been able to quantify TruSeq libraries and they have been working just right. It looks like primer sequences are correct, so I don't know what could be causing the problem.
kcchan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2012, 06:11 AM   #2
pmiguel
Senior Member
 
Location: Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,317
Default

Yes, we got a library, already normalized and eluted as single strands using the kit protocol. The protocol called for us to just heat denature it, snap cool and immediately load into the reagent cassette for sequencing. But we did a KAPA qPCR kit (not the Illumina-specific kit, just the generic one) using normal flow cell oligo primers. The result looked fairly reasonable, so we proceeded. Basically just did what the protocol asked. (Okay, I spiked in phiX out of paranoia -- but otherwise the followed the instructions on the box.)
Worked okay.
--
Phillip
pmiguel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2012, 02:05 PM   #3
kcchan
Senior Member
 
Location: USA

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 184
Default

You've had luck with the bead normalization? I've never been able to get it to work. Anytime I use the beads I get a uneven distribution of up to 50%. That's why I'm relying on qPCR to quantify my library.
kcchan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2012, 07:29 AM   #4
pmiguel
Senior Member
 
Location: Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,317
Default

You get better than 0.5x variation in read numbers using qPCR? Like you have several samples in a pool and the lowest one gave you 20 million and the highest gave you 30 million? That would be close enough to perfect to satisfy me!

I did not do the bead normalization myself -- we just got a Nextera XT pool from a customer and ran it. There were >20 different index pairs in it. I generally call it a "win" if the lowest sample gives > 1/2 the number of reads as the highest sample. So by that criteria, it was good. Actually, if I remember correctly, it was better than that.

--
Phillip
pmiguel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO