![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GC Bias on Illumina Platforms | ndelaney | Illumina/Solexa | 23 | 03-09-2012 02:52 PM |
Illumina quality bias 5' end | mapardo | Illumina/Solexa | 4 | 08-17-2011 08:42 AM |
Extreme nucleotide bias at fragment ends of Illumina mate pair library | kmcarr | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 3 | 03-17-2011 02:03 PM |
Sequencing bias on the Illumina platform | HTS | Illumina/Solexa | 0 | 12-19-2009 09:18 AM |
Captured sequences | suludana | Illumina/Solexa | 0 | 01-21-2009 04:48 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: UK Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 24
|
![]()
Hi All
We performed captured DNA sequencing of all exons belonging to 10 genes using MYselect kit (from MYcroarray company). The sequencing was done using both Illumina and 454 platforms. When we plotted the average coverage across all captured regions (after dividing each exon to the same number of bins to account for the differences in exon length) we got very strong bias toward 5' of exons with Illumina, such that 5' of exons have higher coverage which decreases toward 3'. However, when we plotted a similar plot with 454 reads, we didn't see the bias, and got the bell shape curve. Do you have any idea what could cause the bias in illumina sequences? Thanks Mali |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|