![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
EdgeR cpm values after batch effects | danielfortin86 | Bioinformatics | 4 | 08-25-2013 10:12 PM |
Library prep woes – unusual bioanalyzer profile of Illumina RNA-seq library | petey | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 1 | 11-19-2012 10:00 AM |
library prep and... | wacguy | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 1 | 11-06-2012 12:43 PM |
Library prep can you get both mRNA and small RNAs in the same library? | willgordon | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 4 | 07-20-2011 12:31 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: North Carolina Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 82
|
![]()
Hi Everyone,
Do any of you have a sense of how often (or how badly) you see batch effects of library prep and/or sequencing in RNA-seq data (Illumina Tru-Seq kits) ? Say I've done an experiment, but I'm not totally convinced I want to run all my samples at once. How bad would it be to prep and sequence 1/2 the libraries now, and then 1/2 later once I am more certain the experiment is worth pursuing further? In my case, I'm outsourcing both the library prep and the sequencing. Thanks! Chris |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: Boston,MA Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 122
|
![]()
As long as it is the same service provider, I would not be too concerned. That is one of the advantages of NGS-you can add data run at different times and still be able to compare them. This is the major downfall of arrays, in my opinion. You can't run samples at different times.
I would just confirm with the provider that they will be using the same technology to prep both sets and run both sets. For example, they are currently making libraries on one robot and will be switching to a different one soon. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Location: North Carolina Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 82
|
![]()
Thanks, thats what I'm thinking. I've had problems in the past, but that was when a number of things varied on the provider side. Barring that, perhaps its ok..let's see if anyone else has thoughts.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Location: Hong Kong Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 46
|
![]()
We prepare libraries by ourselves. With the same one kits (TruSeq DNA + Exome kits), we did see the duplicate rate increased between 1st and 2nd batch of library preparation. The cDNA libraries prepared by TruSeq RNA kit may have the same issue since both DNA/RNA are using the same enzymes.
Wei |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
batch effects, library preparation |
Thread Tools | |
|
|