Go Back   SEQanswers > Bioinformatics > Bioinformatics

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
unmapped reads assigned to chromosomes efoss Bioinformatics 4 12-01-2011 01:24 PM
RNA-Seq: Defining the transcriptome and proteome in three functionally different huma Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 12-24-2010 02:13 AM

Thread Tools
Old 04-25-2011, 07:44 AM   #1
Junior Member
Location: Oxford, OH USA

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3
Default How many functionally-assigned reads is enough?


We are analyzing some 454 results annotated by MG-RAST v2. We have 6 samples in each category, e.g. A1, A2,...,A6 for category A and B1, B2,...,B6 for category B. (A and B are different treatments.) In each sample, we have between 15,000-40,000 reads with an assigned annotation.

Now, let's assume that A1 has 10 reads assigned to "carbohydrate processing". Is that enough to do a comparison with sample B6 which has 1,000 reads assigned to "carbohydrate processing"? Is 100 even enough to count as non-spurious? We assigned reads using an e-value threshold of 10^-5 and length of 100.

We would like to gauge (1) what is the minimal number of reads per sample, per functional category, that would be considered non-spurious and (2) what would be a good difference level between number (or percentage) of reads assigned to a certain function to say that the differences are significant between samples, and that those sample have different functional profiles?

Last edited by idoerg; 04-25-2011 at 10:47 AM.
idoerg is offline   Reply With Quote

454 data analysis, functional annotation

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO