Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bowtie. Different outputs from equivalent(?) inputs.

    Hello all

    I'm currently trying to align & annotate lots of short sequences to the human genome (from Ensembl) using Bowtie (and R).

    When the query sequences are given on the command line (with -c) as a comma-separated list I cannot make get Bowtie to yield the same result when using a self-created FASTQ-file. The suspected error is what I choose as default (Phred) read qualities in the FASTQ-file. It is clear that if Bowtie is given sequences on the command line it must assume some default read qualities, but what is the default value? I cannot find the answer in the Bowtie manual but I suspect, that the answer is Phred quality 40 (corresponding to ASCII character "h"(?)) since this quality is used with other commands.

    Using "h" as default read-quality, however, does not give exactly the same results? Where am I taking the wrong turn?

    Minimal example: Running

    bowtie -a --fullref Homo_sapiens.GRCh37.63.cdna.all TestFASTQ.fq test1.txt
    bowtie -c -a --fullref Homo_sapiens.GRCh37.63.cdna.all AAATTGCTCTTAGCATA test2.txt

    where the TestFASTQ.fq is simply

    @Seq1
    AAATTGCTCTTAGCATA
    +
    hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

    does not give the the same results.

    The output from my R-script is (which filters and formats the bowtie output)

    > genes1
    [1] "ENSG00000135829" "ENSG00000135829" "ENSG00000135829" "ENSG00000151789"
    [5] "ENSG00000127081" "ENSG00000122042" "ENSG00000162894" "ENSG00000187699"
    [9] "ENSG00000187699" "ENSG00000231890" "ENSG00000182749" "ENSG00000233124"
    [13] "ENSG00000228002" "ENSG00000101040" "ENSG00000101040" "ENSG00000112773"
    [17] "ENSG00000112773" "ENSG00000112773"
    > genes2
    [1] "ENSG00000135829" "ENSG00000135829" "ENSG00000135829" "ENSG00000151789"
    [5] "ENSG00000127081" "ENSG00000122042" "ENSG00000162894" "ENSG00000231890"
    [9] "ENSG00000187699" "ENSG00000187699" "ENSG00000182749" "ENSG00000233124"
    [13] "ENSG00000228002" "ENSG00000101040" "ENSG00000101040" "ENSG00000112773"
    [17] "ENSG00000112773" "ENSG00000112773"

    (EDIT: The two vectors above differs at positions 8 and 10)

    Can anyone help me?

    Thanks!
    AEB

    ps. does anyone know, how to make Bowtie return Gene Symbols. I.e. get DHX9 for ENSG00000135829 and so on.
    Last edited by AEB; 08-18-2011, 01:41 AM.

  • #2
    You should use the org.Hs.eg.db bioconductor package to convert between human gene symbol and Ensembl IDs

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • seqadmin
      Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
      by seqadmin


      Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
      04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
    • seqadmin
      Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
      by seqadmin


      Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
      03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
    0 responses
    25 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
    0 responses
    28 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
    0 responses
    24 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
    0 responses
    52 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Working...
    X